SKR-7 and some of those MPK Subchasers are nuts too
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Not in the game rn. Can you stop beating around the bush and tell me why you are so pissed about panthers for some reason
I think you’re trying to bait me into a one-on-one argument so that I end up getting penalized.
Honestly, that would probably suit the developers just fine.
Go to “Simulation Battles” and select the first option: “Ground Simulator Battle.”
There, you’ll see the tanks available in the German, Japanese, and Italian tech trees.
For Germany, you have models like the Panther F, G, and so on.
Now, look at the “Allies” side—examine those tanks. Take a close look at the French models, and check out the British ones—look at the Centurion Mk 3 and Caernarvon, their ammunition, and their reload times.
Do you really think these vehicles are on par with the Panther F? The Panther F was a 1945-era vehicle, produced in very limited numbers. The others were built between 1950 and 1960 and are vastly superior in every performance aspect.
So, do you honestly think these vehicles are equivalent?
And by the way, have you ever actually played a Simulation Battle?
#To be frank, I am not going to let this matter drop.
Being treated like a fool goes against my character.
Pr23 Sovetsky Soyuz was laid down. The guns were built, although their accuracy and firerate is dubious.
I know nothing of coastal meta so I can’t comment on them other than the SKR-7 is worthless past 4km.
M4A3E8 Easy 8 given both are comparative late war tanks. T-34-85 is a bit earlier with a 1944 variant and a 1945 variant.
Out of all of these, Panther F is better armored and has a better gun.
Why does it matter if something was built or not when the devs decided realism doesn’t actually matter when they started allowing vehicles that were in service decades apart should face each other. Talk about cherry picking.
Some pershings, some charioteers, a few french things, T-34-85s… What exactly are you getting at?
If the french things you find problematic, then thats probably bc they are higher in BR
Well i’m an idiot who barely plays naval and this is my stats in an MPK subchaser
As I said, the Umbrella Company definitely produced it. I wasn’t wrong.
You must be an AI. I’m going to train you.
If you’re free right now, click on “Simulation Battles.”
From there, select “Ground Simulation Battles.”
Look at the German tech tree—you’ll see the Panther F and G.
Now, examine the opposing Allied vehicles. Take a close look at the French vehicles—which feature 4-second autoloader cycles and 270mm of penetration—as well as the Centurion Mk 3 (with its 1948-pattern ammunition capable of 380mm penetration) and their Soviet and American counterparts.
In your view, are these vehicles—produced in 1950 or later—truly equivalent to the Panther F?
almost like they are a higher BR
easy kill if you click on LFP. APDS shatters all the time, its 7.7 and higher in BR
1 Like
Good boy.
And this is what I face these vehicles with: the Panther F.
Because naval’s rules are ‘if the ship was laid to any degree’ or ‘had parts unique to it constructed’, ie the 51cm prototype that may have been for the A150 class, then it’s fair game for being added in warthunder.
Irz here decided to try and pull a ‘gotcha’ by cherry picking the Pr69s and Pr82.
‘You don’t agree with me so you must be a bot’
Speaking of underhanded and passive aggressive remarks…
I see a battle rating difference with the Panthers being lower. What’s the issue here?
1 Like
lower in BR and the higher BR ones are better. no shit sherlock
now what you asked me was equivalent mediums. That would be the M4A3E8 with worse armor and the T-34-85 which is just worse, and the Charioteer which plays more like a light tank
Also it’s not exactly like you are srtuggling per se
Anyways I was originally only here to point out you put “aircraft” in the title of your ground vehicle rant. I should get going now
You’re cunning, but not all that cunning.
I have no complaints about the M26 or the T-44.
My issues are with the French monsters, the British tanks, and the T-44-100.
I face these vehicles using the Panther F.
Can’t wrap your head around it? Even though there are equivalent alternatives, these vehicles have been included.
Of course you will go. The arguments you were going to defend have been refuted, one by one.
‘wahhh I got uptiered and have to fight better vehicles because the matchmaker said so’
Homie are you serious? In a vehicle that can just as easily kill the very vehicles you’re whining about? You’re gonna complain about this when nobody complains when they get uptiered and have to fight a Panther or Tiger 2 in a tank that struggles against them?
Go play naval and fight an actually competent light or heavy cruiser in a destroyer or a cruiser against a battleship. Then we’ll talk about fairness.
Because I’d much rather take my chances being uptiered in ground or air sim than naval.
This is a sim thread. I don’t bother with these threads usually but the title was named so stupidly I felt I had to comment. All this arguing was me falling for your bait.
Ship combat should take some cues from its alternatives.
However, I am specifically talking about the vehicles that face the Tiger II (H) here.
You can move on to another topic, AI.