Flagship that is almost 10 years old which considered to be quite old in current technology.
Now granted it was the best specs you could buy during that time but average warthunder player should be able to run wt on higher than ULQ in this case which many dont do it on purpose in order to benefit from ULQ advantages.
Those who can’t afford the higher specs are more than welcome to play on ULQ tho.
try to play on ultra low, you will die a lot more time from not being able to spot enemy has easely
Personaly what killed me most as a ULQ user is shitty fps in saturated environment (around 15), but i think this is panly due to me running the game on an quadro 1000m.
Keep in mind that 1080ti can keep its own against something like RTX 4060 in plenty of titles, which is a GPU released 6 years later and is still really popular among gamers today.
Depends on what framerate he’s expecting.
It can even hold itself against non OC 5060-70 iirc.
1080TI was so ahead of its time, the time when NVIDIA wasn’t so greedy and didn’t depend on AI that much.
Average fps should be 60 in order to play this game smoothly and I believe even a basic setup from 2017 should be able to handle it without too much issue unless you’re forcing 2/4k.
Now, I find this thread interesting because earlier today I increased my graphic setting from ULQ to meduim FOR a competitive advantage, has I struggled a lot to spot tanks
And I will say it is night and day, ulq have an inherent disadvantages, and every GOOD player ive talked too about this said the same thing, ulq is bad and people are miss-lead when they think it’s overpowered
Nah, 5060/70 will blow it out of the water easily.
It’s more that the raw performance development stagnated drastically and moved towards other things like fake frames or memetracing.
Having 60 fps on average is a different experience to having 100+ on a high refresh rate monitor.
Not really, in terms of pure power 1080Ti still holds the advantage against those cards until Ai tech gets into the competition such as DLSS and frame gen and even then 1080Ti can use those features thanks to AMD.
For example I can easily play Marvel Spiderman’s 2 on ultra settings with mods on 60+ FPS constantly because of AMD DLSS and Frame Gen.
100+ refresh rate monitor isn’t something basic tbh.
What ?
Neither 5070 nor 5060 need fake frames or upscaling to handily beat 1080ti.
Isn’t it ?
I can see 100Hz+ monitors costing only pennies more than 60Hz ones with the same size and resolution.
Sorry got confused with 5050 for a sec.
I remembered 5050 managed to beat 1080Ti after all those years with overclocking, got confused with 4070 there.
Still with ai tech 1080Ti doesnt struggle even on modern triple A games.
What I meant is those monitors are not basic for a setup that was an entry level from 2017, unless you’re planning to play games from 2005-2015.
Why are you even arguing? from a legal standpoint they cant lock game modes from certain players
Stop arguing and make a poll in suggestions and we can hope the devs one day see the idea of benchmarking to use this or that settings
RTX 5050 is still better than 1080ti in pure rasterization, but not by that much though.
You’d need to define what struggling is first.
They weren’t basic back then, true.
Nowadays high refresh rate monitors are pretty much the best bang for the buck when it comes to improving your gameplay experience, especially if you’re into games that aren’t taxing to your system.
The only competition when it comes to that are Ryzen CPUs.
On triple A games with high settings and 60fps is not struggling in my book which my 1080ti can achieve most of the time.
As it should be considering its 5000 series, still 1080Ti holds advantage in certain areas.
That’s fine although AI help comes with some disadvantages when it comes to image quality.
Can’t think of any though.
Well its a 2017 card running modern Triple A games so compensation is must at some point.
Even VRAM is higher on 1080Ti which just a one advantage over 5050.
Aside from that you can check dedicated webpages to see what other advantages 1080Ti holds against 5050.
Do you read the forums…? Its mentioned not nearly as often as bigger issues and theres threads on it
While the 1080ti has more VRAM the 5050 has GDDR6 which is miles faster than GDDR5X which is what the 1080ti is stuck with
Despite having GDDR6 5050 barely beats 1080ti on most games which proves how 1080Ti was ahead of its time.
Its time to accept the defeat after many years tho.