Is it really that effective? Never used the Za35 but once ammo dumped in the marksman with sabot rounds ,into the rear and side of a T series tank (I think t64 but don’t quote me on that) and it did 0 damage. I’ve used the falcon a bit, and it’s only really effective against light tanks, IFVs etc. maybe a medium tank if it’s not heavily armoured.
How is the ZA35 any more dangerous than any other IFV at the same BR with ATGMs and probably better rounds and better armour and possibly even TVD
The ZA-35 should have thermals and probably APDS as well. It’s definitely a 8.7 vehicle if they fix it. The radar shouldn’t extend as far as it does as well. Well it can but that’s the secondary extension. It should be like this when not extended fully.
It could extend to any height crew wanted to. On that pic only antenne is up, the mast could be lifted to max, just like in game, or any position in between 0 and max.
We can just have the two min/max modes when changing the radar range. What also would be nice if we had a setting to move the range up and down. Obviously F-16 pilots have a button that only moves the range of the radar up until it circles back to the min range.
Nah, as radars with variable height are not as common yet. Once we get to more modern things there will be some more radars with variable antenne height, but most are 0 1.
And if you mean the 12km(?) radar range then idk, the way gaijin models spaa radars is a mystery to me.
I’m talking about aircraft and SPAA. I’m tired of having to move from 20km to 9km through the 200km range to get an accurate lead
Then go make a suggestion for range going back, duh. It will go well i promise you.
Let me guess. The Russians didn’t know how to do this until the MiG-29/Su-27?
Like hell i know. That woul just be qol change, so…
I’m lazy. Not doing it. Easier to complain constantly.
That drives me nuts too. Why we don’t have an up and down option for dozens of control settings is annoying
but we do have one for hydraulic suspensions
and those are on like 3 tanks
The only thing the ZA-35 has going for it is mobility; it is very fast, and reasonably agile, which menas you can pull off (with help of some cover) some fun maneuvers to end up right next or behind someone, and if you’re lucky, you’ll kill them.
But it’s incredibly situational, and against anything that has some armor (MBT…) you need perfect side shots, and you need to know exactly where to aim to get the most bang for your buck. You basically need to disable the gunner or barrel right away. Against anything with an autocannon? You’ll die messily.
I think Gaijin did it that way because their radar implementation is that it’s either on or off, and range toggling is for the scope scale only. Would be nice if they’d implement it, that’s for sure…
Painful to deal against Brits well that new
I think it’s fine.
Yeah, kinda my point. Just a nuke printer if you ask me.
Guess you should research it and start printing nukes then, buddy.
So frech spaa dont have Stabilizer, and its goin to be 8.7 while this shi* is 8.3 everything ok with gaijin??
Glad you ignored other things.
French spaa has a mixed belt of apds on a semk fast chassis