Really? Which tech tree has 16+km SPAA against jets? Oh wait, none of them.
They’re 13km at most, and that’s Pantsir.
Meanwhile GBUs have a 16km range, AGM-65s have a 20km range, and so forth.
Pantsir: 13km.
AGM-65: 20km.
So your post’s claim is 13km > 20km… lol Sorry, but 20km is greater than 13km.
Zero tech trees in War Thunder have the range to deal with current top CAS, this is common knowledge.
Just like War Thunder:
Keep ignoring facts all you want.
All ATGMs feel kinda wack since they changed how they work. They’re much more likely to fly around, and they feel less accurate. Some also seem to drop downwards out of the barrel, which is unrealistic, but that could be explained by the offset between the sight/barrel.
You have to fire them when using gunner sights.
Probably the most accurate thing about War Thunder is the fact that ATGMs are slaved to the gunner sights for aiming.
IDK where you got the 13km from because if you go in game the pantsir clearly has a 20km launch range. Which is equal to the lock range of the AGM-65D. The only explanation of this mistake that doesn’t make you out to be a complete liar is that you must have somehow gotten it confused with the VT1 missile which has a 12km launch range.
Except in war thunder it does a weird dip and it take a second to start flying above your crosshair, that’s my main issue with it, the fact that it’s flight characteristics are unnecessarily sluggish, and it’s armor pen/damage isn’t realistic in the slightest.
Keep it civil or get lost.
From the game, and testing.
Paper stats =/= real performance.
Just cause the Magic 2 can go 14km doesn’t mean it can go 14km against a maneuvering target.
Pantsir’s range against a maneuvering jet is 13km. Tested with over 50 missile launches on aircraft… me being the aircraft since I didn’t trust people to be the aircraft.
Pantsir does not and has never had a 20km range.
It has a 13km range against jets, an 18km range against hovering helicopters, and 20km range against drones coming toward it. This is common knowledge among CAS players like myself and Hunter.
Weird of your post to accuse everyone of being liars.
It’s sad your post is nothing but insults while mine show you respect.
Use tank gunner sights, as that’s what the missiles are correctly slaved to.
The same can be applied to mavericks as well. I don’t think I’ve ever gotten a reliable 15-20km shot with my maverick, unless the pantsir was just sitting there ignoring me or distracted.
I’m not accusing you of being a liar, just seemingly miss representing facts.
Nowhere any of my posts am I insulting you.
That’s what I used.
Any Pantsir paying even halfway attention is just going to shoot down any maverick fired at it.
i call bullshit if other nations get the F.A 18 and we dont lol
we own you. get with the program.
Well know you are getting desperate lol.
Besides that. When i literaly was rushing with those tanks and didnt even had real line ups.
That just shows that you are salty becsuse i do have a point.
Besides that i like to prefer to look at general stats. I always respawnnin general even if its a losing match.
Sure if you quit a game even afrer first desth just because you are losing of course u gonna go out with a positive kd.
But i even spawn my vwhicles if i am in a massive disadvantage.
Tame thats as you want. But you are bringing realy irrelevant things into here
I pointed out how you are spreading missinformation thats it. The while thing would be resolved a long while ago if you had changed the boxer to the puma s1.
But you wanted this to be somekind of fight and are clinging to weird statements that spaas and artillerys are light tanks which is just wrong.
Truthfully i thought we just let the matter rest now and end it.
But you had to dig unrelevant things up
We get 1 plane or 1 tank, I do not count the Naval because Naval is not an excuse to justify that “*insert Country here is getting stuff” however you made a good point to a certain extent.
