get good learn weak spots
8 Likes
yea lets look at these pixel sized weakpoints on a t26e5. while KT/IS2 turrets at the same br can be penned easily by mediums
are us mains seriously defending this lmfao
brothers whining about tiger 2 p which is only slightly worse and the weak spot is highly incosistant IS-2 does not deserve but they dont really have anything to replace it and the weak spots are pretty easy to hit its a jumbo sherman basically
6.7 was supposed to be the new 6.3 but gaijin has yet to decompress br yet so
Really King tiger at 7.0? With a full up tier it will be facing M60’s and Sheridans.
And with Super Pershing I think it should stay at 6.7 and not go to 7.0 sure it has good armor and a good gun but it’s reload is way worst then the king tigers.
Just don’t ask for this you will regret it later.
1 Like
Lmao are u actually stupid? Even the tiger ii h gets penned through its turret easily in a downtier
Hahahaha is this a problem? Then play is6 is4 or t10a, tanks created a moment after the end of ww2 fight on tanks that have apfsds full stabilization and we often add ner armor, and you have nothing but a stupid gun from ww2 times and 20 seconds of reload.
Why not talk about the rolling efficiency of German 6.7 to other 6.3? Many 6.3 vehicles are still using 76mm guns, and they look like paper in front of the Tiger King. Even the 7.7 IS6 needs to hit the weak point on the Tiger King turret to kill, otherwise it will take more than 20 seconds to load
Although many 7.7 vehicles are indeed strong compared to the Tiger King, vehicles from 5.7-6.0 are too weak compared to the Tiger King H. If you are willing, some vehicles from 7.0-8.0 can be adjusted up by 0.3, but this does not affect whether the Tiger King H is not suitable for 6.7
Tiger 2 H should absolutely move up to 7.0, it’s insane it’s somehow considered inferior to the T29 and Tiger 2 105, and being equal to the T26E5 and T26E1-1 and IS-2 1944… it is objectively MUCH superior to the other 6.7s heavies, even the T34 which has massive shortcomings of inconsistent AP damage, bounce chance and long reload time.
1 Like
get good little bro
tiger 2 h is fine where it is its perfect counter to things like T26-E5 and E1 most of those “6.7” should go back to 6.3
is6 is op premium that has a very small weak spot which only gets its turret crew
still have yet to disprove my points now are resorting to stats you truly have lost
and congrats on killing people who just started the game
Both are good where they are IMO, bringing them up to 7.0 would make them borderline unplayable, imagine a King Tiger facing a Strv 103. I agree the M26 should be a bit lower, but the IS-2 '44 and the T-44 being weak? I don’t agree with that.
is2 1944 is pathetic. Less pen than at tiger 2 at double the reload and significantly worse armor.
T44 only functions because the russian 85mm still makes no sense at all. They have a 135 pen shell that pens 80mm armor at 60 degrees. ‘blunt nosed shell’ bullshit thats artifically inflated to godlike slope pen capabilites.
BR-471D pens almost the same as the PzGr 39/43 at the cost of less explosive mass compared to the BR-471B, I’ve never had any real issue with that.
Except for the front of the turret and the LFP the rest is alright (frontally).
The IS-2 has its ups and downs but in no way it’s pathetic, its gun deletes anything that’s penetrated. It’s an alright tank.