The Tiger King H with 6.7 and T26E5/Super Pershing should go to 7.0

Why do Tiger King H and Tiger King P, M26 and Super Pershing/T26E5 stay in the same BR. However, the Tiger H and Tiger E tanks, as well as the T54 (1947) and T54 (1951), have to be separated into different BRs, which is obviously unreasonable

The turret of the Tiger King P will be pierced by 85mm and 76mm cannon fire, while the Tiger King H will not, which is obviously a huge improvement

The body of the T26E5 can defend against direct fire from 122mm cannons, while the Super Pershing has been equipped with a 90mm cannon with a long barrel, which is clearly a huge improvement

The three weakest clowns in the current 6.7 are M26, is2(1944)๏ผŒt44๏ผŒ But it is in the same BR as Tiger King H, T26E5 and other obviously stronger vehicles, which obviously makes players lose confidence in certain vehicles

2 Likes

stop remaking threads that got locked

11 Likes

This is an issue with br compression than anything. Moving vehicles up or down in br will cause more issues than fixing anything.

4 Likes

get good learn weak spots

8 Likes

yea lets look at these pixel sized weakpoints on a t26e5. while KT/IS2 turrets at the same br can be penned easily by mediums

are us mains seriously defending this lmfao

brothers whining about tiger 2 p which is only slightly worse and the weak spot is highly incosistant IS-2 does not deserve but they dont really have anything to replace it and the weak spots are pretty easy to hit its a jumbo sherman basically

6.7 was supposed to be the new 6.3 but gaijin has yet to decompress br yet so

Really King tiger at 7.0? With a full up tier it will be facing M60โ€™s and Sheridans.
And with Super Pershing I think it should stay at 6.7 and not go to 7.0 sure it has good armor and a good gun but itโ€™s reload is way worst then the king tigers.
Just donโ€™t ask for this you will regret it later.

1 Like

Lmao are u actually stupid? Even the tiger ii h gets penned through its turret easily in a downtier

Hahahaha is this a problem? Then play is6 is4 or t10a, tanks created a moment after the end of ww2 fight on tanks that have apfsds full stabilization and we often add ner armor, and you have nothing but a stupid gun from ww2 times and 20 seconds of reload.

Why not talk about the rolling efficiency of German 6.7 to other 6.3? Many 6.3 vehicles are still using 76mm guns, and they look like paper in front of the Tiger King. Even the 7.7 IS6 needs to hit the weak point on the Tiger King turret to kill, otherwise it will take more than 20 seconds to load

Although many 7.7 vehicles are indeed strong compared to the Tiger King, vehicles from 5.7-6.0 are too weak compared to the Tiger King H. If you are willing, some vehicles from 7.0-8.0 can be adjusted up by 0.3, but this does not affect whether the Tiger King H is not suitable for 6.7

Tiger 2 H should absolutely move up to 7.0, itโ€™s insane itโ€™s somehow considered inferior to the T29 and Tiger 2 105, and being equal to the T26E5 and T26E1-1 and IS-2 1944โ€ฆ it is objectively MUCH superior to the other 6.7s heavies, even the T34 which has massive shortcomings of inconsistent AP damage, bounce chance and long reload time.

get good little bro

tiger 2 h is fine where it is its perfect counter to things like T26-E5 and E1 most of those โ€œ6.7โ€ should go back to 6.3

is6 is op premium that has a very small weak spot which only gets its turret crew

you:

me:

get good little bro

1 Like

still have yet to disprove my points now are resorting to stats you truly have lost

and congrats on killing people who just started the game


still better than you xd