The subtree of Polish helicopters

Russia nor Germany are the options. Both from Historical point.

2 Likes

Thailand operates T-84s & BTR-3s. Indonesia has a major period where they exclusively operated Soviet equipment, including mig-15/17/21, even Tu-16. Hell, Malaysia literally operates a variant of the PT-91, a polish T-72 derivative. Redfor tech is likely going to end up in the tree regardless, I’d rather it be less of a complete mismatch of 6 armies.

Japanese officers in Poland in 1928-1930


Narcyz_Witczak-Witaczyński_-Wizyta_Japończyków_w_1_Pułku_Szwoleżerów_w_koszarach_przy_ulicy_29_Listopada_w_Warszawie(107-240-2)

3 Likes

I dunno man from what Gaijin said it seems to be that they want to add selected vehicles from Asian countries to Japan.

Independent Polish tree can work, but don’t get hopes up, I will probably be on a walking stick by the time they are implementing it.

I understand that, and in light of the leaks am fully aware this is likely just hopium at this point. However, when I see a nation with actually unique and interesting heli options, alongside an actually top tier capable SAM, I can’t help but hope.

1 Like

Polish-Japanese cooperation (yes, I know it’s the UN force)


It’s a bit stupid, but Polish soldiers have steel helmets introduced in the 1960s, and Japanese soldiers have Kevlar ones.

1 Like

Let’s hope that will happen as soon as possible.

1 Like

-1 Niet

1 Like

Yeah no -1

1 Like

Based +1

-1, Japan already has its own options for sub trees, Poland also makes absolutely no sense.

HELL no

If we were to allow subtree simply because the host and sub-tree country has cordial relationship without any military or cultural relationship to back it up, then I guess we can just add Brazilian vehicles to Japan or Turkish vehicle to China simply because they have a long-lasting diplomatic relations. This is like opening a huge can of worms that I would rather prefer leave that untouched. -1

4 Likes

That was a really interesting read about Polish and Japanese relationships, thanks for sharing.

I would say +1 for the concept but -1 for Japan, that’s a real can of worms.

There is no precedent of cooperation against common enemy = subtree. And to go on a similar note Poland declared war on Japan in ww2 (it would be the first subtree to be at war with the main during ww2). One Polish pilot in the Flying Tigers squadron would shoot down two Japanese planes.

Albeit the Polish declaration of war was only to stay loyal to the allies and cooperated with Japan against the soviets in exchange for Japanese passports for epsionage (on Germany)

Yes to it being added to the game, but NO for Japan. Given the possible future Thai and other SEA additions which have been hinted at, they’d be a much better addition to the Japanese helicopter tree than Poland. That said, I would like to be able to play these Polish helicopters, especially since I suggested the Mi-2URP-G. So, in effect, ~1.

Average Japanese subtrees suggestion, honestly. Loosely put: find any random nation with relations other than hostile to Japan. It has to be in the same half of the globe as Japan is in so people living on the other half might think they have something in common (muh both Asian) (this one violated in this suggestion). Then proceed to find the every single obscure link to Japan that country has.

Bonus points for using the Japanese occupation of said nation as a justification for the subtrees.

You’d wonder why these people aren’t content with domestic vehicles…

1 Like

You are wrong. On December 8, 1941, the Japanese carried out an armed invasion of Thailand. During the fighting, both sides suffered losses. Currently, Thailand is already part of Japan. No shots were fired in the Japanese-Polish war, so there was a war but no fighting.

It’s not that deep bro, it’s just a concept for a suggestion. It’s not like @Grzegames is a dev, so there is no reason to treat another player with hostility.

I think you will find equal vehemence towards Vietnam being included as a subtree in China

1 Like