this is probably due to the rewards being bad(in comparisson to playing a tank) and not that entertaining playstyle…
the problem goes further when you also see that in order for planes to spawn the enemy has to get points and isnt allowed to spawncamp in by the time they have cas, which isnt the best combo for playing spaa.
2 Likes
The dynamic spawn zones suggestion would go a long way to counteract the spawncamping of spaa, and allowing them a little more space, the only issue is that most maps currently dont have the space to host them…
moving caps would probably not solve the spawncaming issues, bc there are way too man instances hwere some players spawncam even tho the do not hold the cap majority or even the cap which is closest to the spawn, and killing spaa in spawn is still a priority when you want to spawn cas. and I doubt that many cards would allow it to function, you dont have many places for the capture points where 1 side does not have an advantage…
1 Like
Bigger maps and dynamic spawns. My dream
If you say it suffer from air rb yeah i can understand that you are against the plane that can do whatever they want like altitude advantages which is big advantages for fox3 engagement but ground it different story
Yes please don’t hug the deck after the initial BVR phase of the match and see 10 missiles coming your way.
I don’t remember what conversation this is, but if this is about putting in more SPAAs, you must be more trashed than I am, and I’m Irish, so not possible. Low tier SPAAs are all the same: fire machine gun at sky and waste most your ammo. Top tier needs more, unfortunately NATO countries prefer to rely on systems and not funny trucks with missiles on the back. What we need is to buff what we already have, make CAS more expensive, and lessen the research needed to research SPAAs and their modifications.
Thats fair, but even so CAS is currently in most BRs just an easy brainoff gameplay, its horrible especially in the Br 4.7 - 6.3 or so.
I’m well aware. My friend uses the Yak9, and I believe you know what happens next. He could get a KA, get eliminated, and then somehow end up with 9 eliminations. Meanwhile I’ll be on the ground, and get lucky to get six eliminations in my KV2 or T-34s.
That’s why I enjoy 6.7: I got my Ratels and G6. G6 and proxy fuses, a hilarious combo.
1 Like
you fight plane and die to plane more than tank in allegedly “Ground” rb battle
1 Like
Ah yes cheery picking
He simply just doesnt play top tier much at all.
I have a feeling he hasnt but I haven’t checked so I’m not going to assume, there are other things to call him out on than that.
1 Like
he says SU34 is extremely OP in GRB, wait till he hears about the SU-30SM
4 Likes
Wait until he hears about the Rafale.
2 Likes
Kh38 arw much better from the hammers
that’s right. the tanks matter more
tbf this post was made well before SU30 was added
I am well aware, it’s just later tense comedy
thats fair and true
SU30 should not have kh38s for balancing reasons
just like how lots of planes are missing ordinance eg. every US high tier plane except f18 missing GPS+laser guided bombs for some reason
5 Likes