u mean AIM-9X, R-74M, MICA-IR/NG, IRIS-T, R-37M, etc not being present ingame and limiting the true nature of the vehicles?
not like R-27R in their current state are any good, even on supersonic platforms
The additional R-73Es is a fact, that one is right at the very least. What I was unsure about was the true intention of the SU-39 Strike Shield. I don’t speak Russian as my native language so I had to use Google translation.
This image specifically
I meant missile class (IR, SARH, and ARH), not individual missiles like the AIM-9X and R-74M. Radar missiles are the true nature of the SU-39, miscommunication on my side.
all i will accept is giving the Su-39 2 extra R-73s and moving it to 11.7.
oh no. my 11.3 Harrier got only 4 aim-9Ls, and my A-10 got Aim-9Ms are 12.0! i need buff asap(Btw A-10 slower than Su-39 and doesn’t got either Vikhirs or Kh-29) so let’s focus on the issue of you buying wrong premium and not complaining about quite balanced if not op jet okay? plus it is not like you got little amount of chaff and flares, you even get a radar! and IRCCM on the tail! only family of jets to get IRCCM btw!
The A-10C from what I’ve heard is underBR’ed, but the point you made for the Harrier is honestly fair. The AIM-9Ls aren’t as good as they use to be. I remember the good times when it was basically just a unflareable ballistic missile.
1 Like
except ur target actually knows how to flare.
it’s pretty much overBR’ed.
1 Like
The reason it isn’t down in Br is most likely do to it being soley a strike aircraft, unlike the Su39, using it air rb for other purposes than getting modifications is just your problem. Do I think it needs a down tier, yes, since it falls into the same trap as the A10 late, with it being severly underpowered in air rb, but its fantastic in ground.
tbh it’s just an A-10A Late with GNSS glide bombs and laser-guided Paveways, nothing special for 11.7.
even Su-39 is better due to the Kh-29TE and Vikhrs.
A-10s have been getting more and more useless with the past of the years, when they were released they were beasts and everybody told u to not head-on them. now i head-on any A-10 i see cuz they’re slow and dumb asf.
Lmao enjoy 13.0
1 Like
I would like it to get its true weaponry aa long as its rating is changed if needed. Doesn’t nearly the exact same vehicle exist in the free tech tree? Don’t see why they can’t make the premium one unique.
12.0 with r27 (non E), balanced :3
it would be free food for other 12.0s or 13.0s
it’s still a very slow and fat aircraft, giving it R-27Rs won’t solve it’s agility problem.
if it needs something is get some agility buffs or smth if u want it to be decent with R-27Rs.
I wonder what would you say if you played with the amx a1a, 11.0 with 2 no irccm fox2’s, and not a single long range air-ground ordnance.
I think it’s you who’s gone crazy.
Brother i dont want to hear it US and Isreal sit at 11.3 with Aim-9D/Gs(rear aspect) and Aim-7E and a horrible radar that chaff hungry and Isreal at 11.7. Su-39 has rear ircm which negates rear lock 10km missiles which actually work and vikrs for takkng out helis really well.
Su-25 T / Su-39 excel at ground striking, it’s one of the best 11.3 jets.
It wasn’t designed to air superiority roles.
Plus you get R-73 which are IRCCM.
Compare that to the AV-8B at thr same br which only gets AIM-9L (and has higher BR in ground RB)
Are you talking about the F-4E and Kurnass, because both of those are excellent at 11.3.
To be fair, it was also explicitly designed to carry R-27s and R-77s.
1 Like
Huh… the more you know…
If that’s the case it would need to be 12.3 at least, it doesn’t really need such a nerf.