According to the video in the report the F-16 can also carry it.
Please god add this it’ll be so funny.
my report for the GPU-5/A to be added to the F-16A-10 (which did actually use them in service, for about a week) also exists, but was on the old forum, so it’s basically lost to time at this point but was created (and accepted) when the F-16’s were on the Dev server.
As an aside said proof isn’t enough for the other F-15s to get it though.
The funny thing is AGM-65 in game has the wrong speed it should be going mach1+ which was bug reported and passed. Now will we ever see a fix, probably not for another 2 years. AGM-65 Maverick likely incorrect flight performance // Gaijin.net // Issues
4 Likes
idk why some ppl keep saying 12, the maximum you can carry is 6 kh38mt on the su30sm
@ARK_BOI is referring to how the Su24 and Su30SM will be 2 different aircraft type/class so the SP will be cheap to respawn in after losing the first one in GRB.
1 Like
I just noticed it shorty after
I would be happy to see it get the Kh-29D (or TD as its labeled in game) instead, if the D gets its accurate IR seeker. I think that’s a fair and historically (not sure if that’s the right term for stuff that’s still in service) accurate trade off.
It doesnt get it IRL…(Ir seeker on kh29)
Really? because every source I can find says it dose, from Wikipedia to the USA Naval Institute guide to weapons systems. here is just some I have handy:
Theyre wrong then.
I think it’s more likely YOU are wrong. I am not going to disregard literally everything I can find written about the missile because some random person on the forums thinks they know better. So unless you have some evidence to support your claim that the Kh-29D dose not have an IR seeker, I am going to continue siding with the information I can find that ALL says it dose.
1 Like
You can, but such thing was reported miltiple times, and only with very bad aources(because theres no good sources that state IR on KH-29TD)
https://warthunder.com/en/game/about#:~:text=You%20can%20find%20yourself%20blasting,from%20a%20fast%20attack%20boat.&text=Over%202%2C500%20highly%20detailed%20aircraft,the%20Revenue%20Share%20Partner%20System!
“Over 2,500 highly detailed aircraft, helicopters, ground vehicles, warships and other combat vehicles crafted carefully from historical documents and surviving sources.” The hypocrisy is like a broken record atp.
But they actually carried those lol
WHAAAT? Thats without LT spot assist? And u complain thats expensive? Jeez man…
Too OP for them apparently.
I’ve seen ka52 players first spawn their goofmobile get their tail shot off, get 3 kills and a couple assists and then immediately spawn su34 and spam KH38 and get 6 more kills in the first few minutes of the match. The fact that su30 can’t even carry it IRL is adding salt to that open wound.
Rules are for thee, not for me!
Apparently SLAMRAAMS need another radar vehicle to work, and would also have to introduce the aim9x right? which is really sad. But it would be cool if they still introduced it
“Clear marketing lie”
B1B with JSOW and JASSM tho, forgot about LRASM too
Well you see, that’s too overpowered because…because…it’s just overpowered. The Mavericks are fine because all IR missiles are equally overpowered /s
1 Like
To be fair. Jsow is capable of drstroying 24 armored targets at once in perfect conditions. JASSM and LSRASM have are also extremelt long range and low observability. We should get a nerfed SLAM to match kh38mt, or ideally remove the missile until we get proper anti air.
Like ussr being the top dog cas is fairly absurd if you have any clue about american air to ground weaponry. Like kh38 is a 2007 design which enetered production in 2015, mt variant usage is sketchy at best.
Us had going by service:
JSOW(1999)
SLAM-ER(2000)
POPEYE/LITE(Rafael/lockmart design was in service with the us in the 90s as far as i know)
JASSM(2009)
AARGM(2008)