I’m not the only one seeing so many inaccuracies in the su30 3d model. Putting the least amount of effort was not expected from gaijin.
The canards are horizontal unlike in real life where they’re angled. (Pictures 1, 2)
In real life the Su-30SM doesn’t have the centerline pylon. ( Pictures 3, 4 )
The flaperons are too wide and extend to the tip of the vertical stabilizer, but in real life they don’t. ( Pictures 5, 6)
The IRST goes too fair on the right side of the aircraft and not in real life, and it doesn’t match the size of the real one. (Pictures 7, 8)
The panels on the side of the air intake shouldn’t be visible. (Pictures 9, 10)
The wings of the aircraft are moved slightly back unlike in the real one, and the fuselage where the canards are attached to shouldn’t look thin. (Pictures 11 - 13)
I don’t know the specific name of it, I’ll just call it a ramp that is next to the IRST is copy pasted from the engines. (Pictures 14 - 16)
There so many other reasons to list out, but these are the exceptional ones.
as you can see it looks more accurate, but then again, the IRST is too big, and the canards are not tilted upwards, so the inaccuracies are noticeable.
We got a total of 3 new different airframes from last update, one would expect that for 3 planes that are not copy and paste, they would do a good job.
We got a total of 3 new different airframes from last update, one would expect that for 3 planes that are not copy and paste, they would do a good job.
3 new airframes that arent copy paste (Su-30SM goes here)
The centre pylon is copied from the Su34 and clips into the rear of the Su30SM but underneath it is the normal pylons that the Su30SM is supposed to have, additionally the pylons under the engine intakes are also copied from the Su34 and clip into the inside of the intakes
