Incredibly shocking
Unlike me she also did a massive reddit post and polls to attract even more people so she did a bit more then i did but nonetheless thanks!
1 Like
Idk who you are talking about but I will assume it is me considering my username is cyrillic and if you type it in with regular a’s, you get that player.
My username has been changed, and it has not updated in the forums.
Anywhere I don’t main Russia, I play all 10 nations, and here are my session stats since Oct 1st of last year.
1 Like
Why are we even bringing up balance in a thread not even about nor like gaijin even care about balancing look at the flakpanzer 341 for example it didnt need to get its pen value buffed but gaijin did it anyway and destroyed a br bracket for like a month and this was after it was known that spaa with large caliber cannons are cancer but it was done in the name of realism
Yeha no the Abrams was always kinda a easy tank to defeat, even before the basket.
All Nato tanks were, its just that. As should be you are rewarded for good shots, not shitty placed snapshots that get engine and turret basket, and nothing more.
1 Like
not you but yes good to know
Holy moly I had s stroke reading my own message afterwards
Truth nuke, that dude that said you can bait shots with abrams LFP because of fuel tank got EXTREMELY lucky. all it takes is one shot anywhere under the turret to fully disable/kill the abrams now, and the russians love that! so why would we possibly want to fix it and make it realistic yes? we must tend to the needs of the russians only yes?
3 Likes
what I was trying to say, warthunder was balanced before the baskets (slightly) as both sides needed to take proper aim to not die if they fire a shot at a unaware enemy or someone you run into around a corner.
1 Like
Appreciate it however it was a friend of mine, not me.
In a way, yep! You sent a couple of nice sources and encouragement, as well as continious activity and support on the “M1A2C Hull armor missing” thread, and that is appreciated, as it’s one of the factors that led me to throw myself into doing this! :D
And, as you mentioned, Hike_DK and the other reporters are the very instrunmental core of our efforts! Without the bug reports, we would have had nothing to rally towards…
Although, apparently, ALL will be in vain anyway, since Gaijin’s mind appears to be set in stone already :')
I’m kinda starting to lose hope. It seems like Gaijin WANTS to deny SEPv3’s hull and WILL do so no matter what.
7 Likes
it comes to a point where it is blatantly obvious that the devs and mods just don’t want to buff it, ive taken a look at the 20+ reports about the hull armor so far, and they keep spamming the same thing: not enough info, and copy paste answer which is usually that we don’t have an EXACT number lmao.
1 Like
Yeah it’s a shame they gotta treat NATO tanks so poorly and refuse even the most detailed bug reports. However if I could choose any 1 thing to change, no matter what the removal of the lmur from the game, or atleast make the ldircms realistic.
Cause we all know about the current placements of the one found on the mi28…
LMUR is becoming garbage next update, they removed its lofting and heavily nerfed its warhead.
1 Like
MITL begs to differ
i mean this is a buff to wathever weaponry who has MITL so not LMUR only
1 Like
Larp feature. Won’t change anything. Slinging 1 LMUR at AA only for it to be intercepted.
1 Like
AH-60 has the opportunity to do the funniest thing next update with MITL and Spike ER flightpath chages.
However that is truely off topic.
2 Likes
Little off topic.
Spoiler
But for what its worth for how much type 10 weighs thats not terrible hull armor it just sucks because it doesnt extend all the way down and the fuel tank under the crew explodes in one shot definitely more armored then Ariete just kind of interesting to me.
yeah XD let’s remain on topic tho you are right
2 Likes