Then why is the report still denied if they are aware their reply is nonsensical?
As said, numbers weren’t provided and they look at all those reports as too vague.
It did give good estimates backed by math which was backed by sources
2 Likes
Estimates that estimated every atom went into LFP protection.
I think you should focus on changing how Gaijin operates in these situations rather than trying to find something that’s unfindable legally.
20 Likes
Now add “Looks similar too…therefor can’t…”
2 Likes
Thank you very much for the shoutout and appreciation!
However, @Jackvony (Abrams operator) said that SEPv3 didn’t get Gen 3s, so I don’t think we should try anything about it.
Instead, I think we should keep the pressure on for the hull!
In the VERY worst case scenario, if they really refuse… give SEPv3 M829A4, so that it feels better than the rest of the SEPs and it becomes the true pinnacle of the American tree by being at least the ultimate glass canon.
4 Likes
Calling M1 a glass cannon is an insult to true glass cannons.
3 Likes
I’ve included it as “structurally similar vehicles”
1 Like
‘We’re satisfied…that Abrams players are getting cucked out of meaningful upgrades once again’
2 Likes
we could also try a lws with the m829a4 since the army has tested the lws meant for the sep 4 on the sep 3 loved it and has requested a 2nd order from the company making the tech if anyone wants to look more into this part the companies name is danbury mission technologies and falls under a company named ARKA
1 Like
Cries in ariete.
3 Likes
I genuinely don’t think they’re communicating with one another at all at this stage.
How can they accept a report which shows the weight increase, shows the fact hte armours been increased at least as much as can be said about a highly classified vehicle, as well as munitions etc-
Then deny one which shows the same stuff claiming the weight all went into the turret.
1 Like
SEPv3 would be a 12.7 (13.0 whenever they do decompression) with 10.7 hull armor.
Now, imagine if Leopard 2A7V had been added with the exact same hull as a Leopard 2A4 xD
Or if T-80BVM had been added with the exact same hull as T-80B.
Can you imagine the backlash there would have been then? Completely deserved… much like SEPv3’s is being.
7 Likes
I doubt who ever was in charge of reading the bug report they sent in yesterday even read it at all it was labeled not enough info withing 30 min to an hour of it being posted there is no way someone can read all 5 sources and the whole like 2k word doc that fast
5 Likes
Sure, but demanding M829A4 while calling it a glass cannon is just a spit in the face for other 12.7 vehicles that have it much worse than M1s.
ooo yay fun, lets play a game of corporate fraud next… cant wait, whos got stealing data… OH wait i got AI art Bingo
1 Like
Its truly a lesson in futility that people are still trying this hard to push for this. Its very clear that Gaijin will never ever budge on this. You will get your M1A2 Slop V3 whether you like it or not.
2 Likes
I do not view this as a “suffering competition”.
I have vouched and advicated for the Leclercs, Merkava Mk.4s, Challengers, etc, as much IF not more than I’m doing for SEPv3.
I want SEPv3, as the peak of its respective tree, to be depicted accurately at maximum capacity just like any other end of the line/top MBT in the game.
7 Likes
The IED kit is lighter on the SEPV3 than previous IED kits. Our sources also specified weight increase was due to the NEA package, not an IED package.
1 Like