The standards to revise M1A2 SEPv3's armor NEED to be revised and calibrated

Except if they don’t believe the source.

Stinger should have 20 - 22 g overload

“Max overload will be 13 G.”

FIM-92A

2 Likes

when will Gaijin actually give US a deathstar to make it’s unworthy mains win a little bit of matches? current abrams is so bahd that it can be killed by T-34

you don’t know about Su-27 flight model reporting story, which was going for like 2 years, don’t you?

oh no, the super op mbt that can be one shot through the most armoured part of the hull by 9.3 russian mbts

yeah, any MBT can be one shot by most 9.3 mbts, that’s the fun part. if armor is so gigaimportant, we need to put type10 and 90 and 10.7 lmao

I disagree. Gaijin is just horribly inconsistent with their standards.

4 Likes

sofa politicians in this game are truly amazing, but what is more amazing is their golden fish type of memory

they are very consistent in their decisions to scam different parts of community, shifting “OP” stuff this or that direction. but pleers are probably watching too much tiktok or just being 10y.o. en masse so they think there’s some scary af conspiracy behind this. you know, when IQ of person goes negative, beliefs replace the logics and deduction

1 Like

Yeah I agree with this. Although they are inconsistent in who gets shafted when and how long. For example China top tier air has been getting shafted for multiple months in a row now.

But they are mainly inconsistent in which of their fantasies they are going to implement as “guesstimates” and when.

1 Like

not through the most armoured part of the hull lmao

As a person who has tested the M1A2C armor in the dev, the turret doesn’t get anything aside from the turret ballasts for the testing version, there is literally no composite improvement like the M1A1-M1A2 composite change, let alone hull armor, it doesn’t feature NGAP, it’s literal only defining change, and is probably just a copy-paste M1A2T with ballasts and better ammo at this rate

1 Like

they could just declare their game funny arcade with elements of realism and be right in that one, also kick some stupid eployees from bugreporting section, because everybody with half-working brain understand, that in reality “there will be NO drifting kills. there will be NO 3pv. there will be no spawn marking”, only massive losses to drones or arty fire, which is not fun and engaging until you play ARMA. so all this holywar with documents and different political cults fighting each other is annoying af. this party is garbage, i hate these people, man

2 Likes

it’s also same for all tanks besides maybe Japanese. what’s ur point?

Maybe one day the US will get the UA M1A2SA with it’s added Kontact 1 ERA will be the best protected M1 in the game!

Behold…the true SEP V3

4 Likes

agree +

1 Like

reference observed, +respect gained

1 Like

Not entirely sure why the Sep V3 can’t get it’s armour increased when shit like the KH38MT is still in game and it’s yet to be proven to even exist.
Not even specific numerical data, just to exist.

1 Like

holy bad faith arguement

IMG_2819

1 Like

They technically could, but that is never happening. Gaijin created their own little niche sub gaming category where they have an almost complete monopoly. If they were to suddenly change their description to being an arcade game they would have to compete with games like WoT etc, which could potentially lead to less revenue and players etc.

So it’s easier and probably more profitable for them to pretend that they actually care about realism to a certain extend.

1 Like