The standards to revise M1A2 SEPv3's armor NEED to be revised and calibrated

Unfortunatly, Gaijin is intentionally not adding the SEPV3 with the Trophy system

Regarding the Rosy and LWS, I’m unsure so I’ll let someone else talk about it

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

They dont wanna add it for balancing reasons cause “every m1 is different” even though the sepv3 is just worse than the v2 now

So many Russian shill posts in this topic just cause USA is getting the best MBT in the game.

Attempts to derail discussion by talking about Russian vehicles & weapons in general.


I think Gaijin could do best by taking more liberty in estimating armor overall across all tech trees.
Could it result in better armor for Soviets as well? Yes it could, but that’s honestly fine.
If it means we can have more interesting top end play than what we have now, I’m more than willing to accept that.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

This thread is about the M1A2. Stay on topic please.

1 Like

Its crazy how abusive the current reporting system is.

Like they can say its not a bug or insufficient info while accepting something far less detailed for russia.

To bad they dont have an option to report folks for bias.

I hope they give SEP V3 and Trophy abrams the .50 on the barrel with tusk kits

If you think a report warrants a second review you can use the report function on the bug report site:

I learned something today. Thank you for sharing Necronomica.

1 Like

The VERY VERY least they can do is give the new abrams’ ROSY and LWS
Loader 50. cal and the other additions that the other SEP’s have

Like it will change anything.

You guys act like Gaijin didn’t do this in the past, they have more than enough sources to increase protection values on V3 yet they delibaretly ignores and act likes blind against those multiple reports.

So yea couple unrelated comments will not change the outcome unless you guys wanna assamble and start second revolution against Gaijin (which highly doubt you will).

Edit: Lmao looks like some people gets offended on anything on these days.

1 Like

Only way to get enough is for the over all effort to be focused on the unequal treatment of multiple nations and the ignoring of bug reports, delayed rolling out. Etc.

Edit, the brits and italians should see the value in supporting this given the state of their mbts.

1 Like

Thats the problem, community doesnt like to unite against Gaijin unless certain feature affects every single one of them.

This thread is perfect example, people here trying to convince Gaijin that what they are doing is simply stupid, on the other hand We got bunch of people who tries to Defend this Companies disgusting policy while also bringing unrelated vehicles into discussion.

People should understand that no one is safe, today USA recieves double standarts, tomorrow another nation will but they seem to forget this quite often, so yea I dont have any hopes when it comes uniting under same principles with those people.

They are more than welcome to prove me wrong tho.

2 Likes

Please, this is not a bug report matter. SEPv3 exists without Trophy, much like SEPv2 does, and in fact there aren’t even pictures of SEPv3s with Trophy yet. In any case, a SEPv3 with Trophy can always come in the future.

Let’s avoid clogging the SEPv3 bug reports with non-issues so that the full focus is on the actual issues.

2 Likes

Right, we’re already on a thin line with gaijin (who are most defiantly laughing their butts off at us right now), so lets try our best to not give them a reason to strike us down for inaccurate information or for going off topic. Let’s focus on getting the main issue out the way before asking for too much :).

2 Likes

Cool. Stay on topic.

2 Likes

What’s the most up to date set of information regarding the hull improvements that community provided to Gajin?