Oh no, if only NATO MBTs like the Abrams had numerous advantages they could use to roflstomp theT-series…oh wait.
I want the LFP protection to be increased so that the SEPv3 at least has a reason to exist in game, however half of your replies are just skill issue posting (and I mean not just here).
M289A3 was designed with double plate ERA in mind(Relikt general design). There are documents and patents proving that.
The USA didn’t have exact Relikt specification like thickness, explosive strength, etc but on a general basis, the sacrificial tip is confirmed by laboratories to work against double plates.
M829A4 is specifically designed to go through Relikt specifications.
conventional round, 152MM darts aren’t that conventional and we know it’s the single highest penning round in game. However it’s
10 second reload
mounted on a T80U without addon armour.
no thermals.
so the tanks not really that big of a threat outwith the one trick that it has. Which at top tier, it gets ragged on. 10.7 it whacks, at 12.7 or up it’s kinda just a meme.
When people say this tank takes skill, it usually means something is off with it. It’s worse than other tanks.
This is an old example. The British have a tank called the Archer. Many people say this tank is for skilled players. And do you know why? Because it’s more difficult than all the others. It’s hard to play, and it requires the skills of a good player.
if you survive any hit which usually leads to a 2 crew man loss you lose the whole reload advantage…T-series maintain it…the kind of maps we get…that kinda matters
People don’t say it takes skill, the Abrams is not that hard to play lmao.
It’s an incredible tank that scales with skill really well.
Meanwhile the T-90M is just not a great tank and easily worse than the Abrams, but because it has armor people like you struggle against it and overhype it.