guys i have come to the conclusion, that all m1a2sepv3 and NEA data is classified, meaning we cannot find it. and the fact its classified means we probably wont. who could have guess classified means it is actually classified. very sad times
Is there someone who has the energy to make a suggestion that the sep v3 should have trophy aps? Iv’e seen 2 bug reports on it with good sources so i know a suggestion would be plausible :)
I think it’s time to ask the Gaijins about where they get their data on the Relict armor. They’re even making some adjustments to it now, but it’s unclear what they’re basing it on.
1 Like
I’m ready to talk in person if you have any information regarding the Relict armor.
The bias is shown by only giving the benefit to certain nations.
I even created a thread with this question.
Where does Gaijin get its information on Relikt armor? - Dev Server “Heavy Cavalry” / General Discussion - Dev Server - War Thunder — official forum
2 Likes
Wait so did you guys make a report using this method and it still got rejected as if it didnt have enough info to accurately make an educated guess of how much the armor would have been improved?
yep, the BRMs are demanding classified documents in direct contradiction to earlier statements from the devs
1 Like
I dont think i can trust the word of the man named Alpharius XD
Could you also link me the bug report that used the math to try to calculate the improved armor thickness based on the weights added to the hull? Im very interested in it and i would love to read what gaijin wrote on the report
Which in my opinion it would be nice to see Spall vests added to the vehicles that actively operate them to try to increase survivability a little bit as well.
1 Like
Y’all need to accept that change only happens for non russian countries if the community unites again.
It is literally the only way.
Change happens for non russian countries all of the time. Can we not beat the russian bias dead horse for a bit.
List the last time a non russian tank got an actual buff that didnt get taken off a week later
Unfinished Draft - Awaiting Finalized Review.zip (308.4 KB)
We have added a new source which provides precentage values to assit Gaijin in seeing the weight difference to additonal Armor
The source us provided under: 2. Baseline M1A2 Armor Breakdown (Source Document Ratios)
11 Likes
Seen the BS they came up with for the CR2 trunnion as well?
They’re now just haphazardly denying pretty much any and all reports.
They really forget about this didn’t they.
So now what do they do?
We can’t get specific classified information, we give them documents which state 35 % increase, so why not use the swedish trials and then a 35% increase from that and call it a day?
They just don’t want to bother doing basically anything which isn’t paying lip service to problems.
Because this patch they’ve what?
- Added a yugo plane to the russian tree when it’s zero to do with russia. Which I need not say is out of order.
- They’ve buffed then nerfed the CR2 and Completely denied how a trunion works in a tank to keep it nerfed.
- Once again Buffed russian equipment, as well as nerfed the BMPT, unerfed it and renerfed it again.
- this tread and the M1A2C treatment aka the rejected bug reports is the more telling out of it all
- turret baskets for CR2s when they have been proven time and time again to not have them.
- as well as turret baskets for the Merkavas -
- No turret baskets conviently for the russian MBTS or chinese MBTS.
And that is just so far what we’ve seen. Oh yeah the M829A3 being funky as well.
It’s quite fishy how all of this is going on now. I seriously have no idea what changed after the LMUR patch they just went full ham with the buffing of soviet / russian kit and bugger to the rest.
2 Likes
Nuclear bomb of a bug report, best of luck!
1 Like
Declasified “in part”