The evidence that Gaijin has to buff the hull on the SEP3 is adding up too fast, they are scrambling for something arbitrary to make worse on the tank before they admit defeat and give it better hull protection
Here!

I’m not saying you aren’t. i am saying in that picture you won’t clearly seen if armour has been imroved on the UFP,
likely, and? one is not allowed to observe the data that’s been provided, or the manner in which it’s provided and make judgement in it?
who is this collective “y’all” as well as what cuase?
I have no cause at all.
we are in fact.
Then you’d know it mentions the UFP as well as the LFP arrays both.
Not just the LFP array.
Irregardless of that, the reports been shot down anyways which is the main cause of many of the frustrations we are all feeling.
new 12.7 $100 premium i bet
Well if someone wanted to report it, T-80 autoloaders are missing the central splined shaft that transfers power & serves as a fluid coupling from the Hull to the Cassette and Rammer.
First to the point of why we’re introducing the baskets to the horizontal aiming drives. From a gameplay and design standpoint, the current damage model (without the basket, with more empty space under the turret) penalizes players who hit the center of mass area where there is nothing to damage, even though they did everything right and landed a shot in this area.
~
From our perspective, we want to avoid penalizing the player who managed to land a shot on the enemy first, reducing those frustrating moments of penetrating a vehicle without doing any meaningful damage — even though the round passed through a significant amount of the interior.


it depends if they keep it with the basic m1a1 armour, because the ukranian ones dont have the U armour package names iirc
it’ll be shot down just the same
And it could be used all the same to get some additions reverted.
true there mate.
just wish we had some bloody consistency with Gaijin.
This thread has 166 unique posters. I guess not so many are actually that invested in this whole thing.

A lot of people just pass by to get updates too in all fairness
That doesn’t really scream invested to me.
Iirc this is a t72/90
That being said the t80 does could have have one, this is for the 115mm t64, im trying to look into the 434 manual to see if they still have one
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
More attention then every other thread this dev server by a lot
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
if we get anywhere near that amount of people to complain, review, or just bug report, theres a good chance they will atleast re think their choices.
The only thing ive seen from you in this chat is complaints, and you not wanting the sepv3 to be buffed. if thats the case then go complain elsewhere. we are trying to fix the many issues that they have done to the sepv3 and you aren’t helping at all, just wasting time
does have over 20 thousand people reading it but.



