I constant escalation of garbage, that needs to stop, for this is not the place for such crap.
1 Like
Jecka was a bit too rude to me and I was a bit too sensitive about it, and hell let loose after someone suggested that it was a “hormonal issue” xD
It’s probably also just a combination of frustration regarding the bug report being denied and having to wait for this Abrams blog.
3 Likes
It’s like those movie scenes where a group of friends starts losing their minds and being hostile towards each other, until one of them screams:
“STOP IT, NOW! IT’S THIS CURSED PLACE, CAN’T YOU SEE? IT’S TURNING US INTO ANIMALS!”
2 Likes
i want to see more abrams talk please!! can we just all be good little cute boys and follow the rules <3
Yeah that’s just ridiculous. I guess after this coming blog for the Abrams, depending on the outcome, we’ll have to start advocating for CATTB. Although, funnily enough, I’m trying to figure out the hull armor…
CATTB will have the m1a1 hull as far as I am aware
1 Like
Is this joke? CATTB hull weighs 78,000lbs (about 39 tons). Doesn’t the Abrams hull only weigh like 20 something tons?
Our ONLY hope of having Abrams tanks with functional hull armor are SEPv3 and a potential future SEPv3+Trophy…
If Gaijin insists on refusing to model SEPv3’s hull armor improvements, then America will be doomed to forever have 12.7, 13.0 and 13.3 tanks from the 2020s (whenever Top Tier is decompressed) with the exact same hull armor as their 10.7 from 1979.
3 Likes
I’ve heard tell of it but I’ve never seen one. Supposed to be in drivers compartment, but I’m not sure it actually exists.
Would you happen to know how much Abrams hull weighs?
All information regarding weights can be found on this extraordinary report, which was automatically rejected without any staff member actually taking a look at it;
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/609Vxao8e2sr
9 Likes
You’re never gonna get Gaijin to change anything reagarding Nato vehicles, at least a top tier.
The more russia looses in the three day special operation, the harder Gaijin is coping and buffing russkia.
2 Likes
Gaijin: “No, we will now revert all changes so there’s absolutely zero differences between every Rank 8 Abrams, despite the amount of documents given to us. We will also be adding in a fictional Turret Basket for the Challenger 2s. We need sources for everything! :3”
Also Gaijin: “We found the insert Russian vehicle to be underperforming, so we buffed the Relikt armour. Sources for the buff? We don’t need sources for balance! :3”
2 Likes
20 hours ago, submitted, 19hours ago rejected.
How can htey say that there isn’t enough information
6 Likes
“All the extra weight went into the turret.” Like he somehow knows that lmao, its so clear they were explicitly told to reject anything related to the Abrams hull for some internal gameplay/agenda reasons the devs want to hold up
4 Likes
All that weight in the turret yet they give it what? 150mm extra armour?
1 Like
which acts like 80mm in the dev for some reason yes.
7 Likes
I think will be easier if we ask to remove the extra weigh from the hull if gaijin refuse to fix its armor for lack of sources
Not ideal, but the extra weigh from armor, in the hull, already calculate, just need gaijin corfimation that they will not change anything
I work from 11:00 to 14:00, so, sadly, I won’t be able to deliver in real time the brutal response tomorrow’s article will probably deserve, if they upload it while I’m working… :')
1 Like