moving it to 7.0 would not fix any of the problems it has.
1 Like
Sure, it would fix the problem of the B-29, but it would cause way more problems, so that’s not the solution.
I’ve looked at the stats and I think I’ve spotted a clear pattern.
2 Likes
I think it’s clear that Gaijin wants bombers to stop being used so it’s one less thing to worry about and another step towards the dumbing down and simplification of the game.
2 Likes
Sure, it would fix the problem of the B-29, but it would cause way more problems, so that’s not the solution.
it would not fix the problems. In fact, the B-29 was at 7.0 for quite a while, and was still shit.
Which BR is right for you?
Except currently the jets you’ve mentioned are at 7.0 or around it, which means that it’s not just facing those. If it was meant to only face those, it would be 6.0 so it faces them and them only.
No, it would at best face late-war props, but mostly face jets. It should face jets only in a full uptier. Simple as that.
Early jets, except in top speed, are worse in everything than super props.
They’re equal in climb rate and better in topspeed, meaning the early jets will have an easier time killing a B-29. Thank you for pointing out why a B-29 should only face early jets in a full uptier.
What I meant was placing the B-29 lower than 7.0 would create more problems
1 Like
Which is why I’ve suggest above that nearly all prop bombers should be brought down in BR, along with an adjustment to the TNTeq required to destroy a base.
I don’t understand your point, you complain that the B-29 struggles against early jets, but then you accept that they are worse than super props. And by the way, if you read a little you realize how bad early jets are at high altitudes. Thanks for once again revealing your lack of experience in this game.
1 Like
If you drop to 7.0 the B-29 will fight against super props in low tier and early jets in uptier. If you drop to 6.0 it will fight against props that don’t stand a chance against it in low tier, super props that some can, like the P51HNA or TA-154, but outside of that few. You lack a lot of experience.
1 Like
No thanks, games would be super boring and would last forever
1 Like
i mean he´s a lv63 who mainly plays arcade and grb
1 Like
That explains a lot of things
HUGE difference between a new version of an existing aircraft and an entirely new, untested plane.
B-29 wouldn’t be introduced until early 1944, and the A6M5 wouldn’t spend very long between prototype and production. Certainly less than the ~2 years the B-29 took.
1 Like
Not sure how long you play wt - but the B-29 was at 6.3 some years ago. This was in the old axis vs allies world - and an experienced pilot had no problem to out climb a B-29 - even in a 190 D-9.
You can enjoy this vid from Bo Time:
You will see some mixed battles thanks to the AD2-1 spam those days, but also regular fighters killing them - so imho you should not be afraid of lower BRs for the B-29.
3 Likes
Nobody said this - but your “Maiden flight theory” is not useful - especially if you compare a brand new aircraft like the B-29 and a sub-variant of the A6M which flew long before 1940. If you look up maiden flights of stuff like Spits, Bf 109s or the famous Me 262 you might see the flaw in your way of thinking…
2 Likes
I’ve been playing for a while, but I admit my mistake.
1 Like