Interesting I’ll have to check that
if they would be the same they would be affected trough passive systems like MUSS as well
1 Like
lol no
Oh yeah my bad I forgot that radar on most SACLOS AA guides the sight not the missile.
in that regard i am gonna hit you with the same SACLOS (semi-automatic command to line of sight;
I was thinking LOS with the radar not a sight.
R73s on 29a ? They are historical, yet they can’t be added for “balance”. Warthunder doesnt have a rule on additions ti aircrafts , so why not?
Cause there are already 13.x Mig-29s for us to use instead.
There’s no reason to make 9.12 and 9.13 copy-paste.
Slaving the gunsight to the radar on the khrizantema is not equal to radar guided missiles
You aren’t getting the point.
I don’t have to prove nothing. You are the one objecting the historicity of the feature, so the Onus of the proof is yours. If anything you know less than I do about the vikhr and the Su-39.
Missiles can beam ride the radar waves, one of the versions of the Khrizantema can do that.
The only thing that can be a bug is the fact that you can use datalink to guide vikhrs using the TWS GMTI.
What historicity xD u didnt even prove that one yet.
I am asking you to show us its possible in reality with the vikhers. I dont need to prove the opposite that aint how it works
1 Like
I mean, it would be an unique addition, it wouldn’t be that strong considering you would need to keep your radar pointed at targets + accuracy would suffer because of how radars work i imagine.
But the vikhr has no radar beam riding capability mentioned anywhere, they had to make other versions of the khrizantema to be able to radar beam ride, so where are the vikhr radar beam rider versions if they exist?
Sadly I haven’t had any luck in finding these informations about any capability of radar guidance on the vikhr. Probably they would be in the same places that there is more info about the specs on Kinzhal-S.
So much to that, so you have shit and cant prove any of your statements
I said it before: the Onus of the proof is yours, you’re the one objecting the historicity of it – claiming it is a bug.
U arent even proving the history of it jesus .
If there is no history i cant even argue against it.
Do you even understand a tiny bit how this all works.
I dont need to prove anything you need to
Oh yeah? I’m not proving the history of it? You know that, in any academic discussion, the side that claims something is the one that have to bring proof: that is the Onus of the proof.
I claimed that, in game, the radar can guide the Vikhrs, but then you came and started claiming it is a bug with the other one, after the balancing discussion.
So, you’re the one making the claim. The Onus of the proof is yours.
Rephrasing it: What proof do you have that it is a bug?
Your claim. So if you’re trying to pull that old internet card of the: “prove me god doesn’t exist”, you’re the one that needs to bring source, not me.
u are making a laughing stock of yourself honestly, you arent able to prove the funcionality of this situation if its supposed to happen or not, you arent even aware if the vikhers should be able to do this or not.
The fact that you are not aware if this is even something that SHOULD happen makes it a bug until proven otherwise .
Furthermore you propose the implementation of a feature which is possible not even real
taken the potentialy last bit of realism out of this game, suggesting a completly imaginary feature which might not even exist and then comparing it to another vehicle and missle which have no relation at all.
Nobody will take you seriously here, because you arent even able to follow the simple suggestion rules. Of providing the necesary sources.
I will sleep good knowing your fever dream will never be implemented since you arent even able to provide the most basic of soruces required to even get it implemented.
The fact you want me to prove that the vikhers doesnt have that ability is rididculous.
You sound like a 5 year old saying “the tiger tank in ww2 had a prototype with a 130mm cannon, prove me wrong”.
Bye, letting this thread die will be the most beneficial for everyone since you cant do anything either way