Has anyone even said it’s not functioning to real life? I thought the argument was more about how Hellfire and JAGM aren’t lofting properly and they lose all their energy before hitting the target because of the PID values. Also not top attacking.
Yeah, this was always the argument I was aware of. Not that the LMUR is necessarily overperforming (though evidence of the Mi-28NM being able to take more than 4 is dubious at best) but that despite 2+ year old reports for Hellfire, Spike, PARS, etc it remains the only missile with properly modeled top down attack profiles
I don’t know how LMURs function IRL, this is why I want to know.
I’m not going to claim LMURs are correctly lofting if I don’t have evidence showcasing that.
I have evidence AGM-114s don’t loft correctly, which is why I make the claim that AGM-114’s lofting is incorrect.
And I have evidence that GNSS guided munitions are capable of vertical lofting maneuvers [Hammer for example], but not for Hammer itself.
One thing this place does exponentially better than Reddit is to somewhat avoid the echo chamber effect that exists, the game’s sub is a den of arrogant people, moreso than many of us.
But I digress, posts that addresses a hot/trending topic will obviously get likes and attention. I’m glad you did it.
They’re actually underperforming a little. Don’t tell gaijin but I have video evidence the max flight time should be longer lol
irl they function closer to how the SLAM functions irl, with an IR seeker transmitted back through datalink and guidance done via man-in-the-loop
Clearly we need to bring back that weapon camera from the 2077 event
So you are still defending a russian addition
Not sure that this would make any difference tho since it would still be limited by its seeker lock range
So after x years of hellfires in game they are not repaired while russians get the good version for them selves… ← that is called bias so please dude just stop…
Trunions… spaa… hardcore cas missiles… aim-120 nerf… come one man

Broken clock is right twice a day
*for now
Russa getting the bests CAS, SPAA and some tanks first, and even at lower BRs isnt some type of russian bias?? Also with features like no turret basket, autloader protection, ERA overperforming, etc.
Also I dont play naval but I see people complaining about Soyuz.
It has been update after update of rusia getting some broken thing because “muh reverse bad”
KA52M watching behind a bush
Inb4 “that doesn’t fit the dictionary definition of evidence”
honestly it is just ridiculous at this point
- cope harder
- it has no proxy fuze
- Fox-3s aren’t necessary when u have DL, which works very well just like in any SPAA
- still one tap’able cuz no armor
- it’s russian doctrine, what’s the problem?
now people cope about the new russian SPAA being too good, before people coped about CAS being too good, is this some kind of cycle or wtf?
i think now i can add another complainment for my book!

like fr, the update just released yesterday and in 18hs there’s already somebody complaining about the new SM-SV?