The Pantsir SM-SV is Simply Too Strong, Russian Bias as Clear as Day

18x worse hellfire monster

As long as you’re having fun man, I just know if I see that profile photo I’m going to be sniffing around the heli pads mid game for sure >.>

1 Like

And you haven’t even spaded the BN or the 2E… Your point?

I have all the necessary mods to make the tank function. 70 games in both is enough.

If you’re saying the M1A1 is better than the 90M should it be the same br or lower? maybe, but my problem is that the capabilities between 11.7 and 12.7 tanks are so similar, 12.7’s are mostly overtiered imo.

Take the M1A1 and the Sep for ex:
M1A1 is better at:
Mobility

And the SEP is better at:
Slightly better shell
better thermals (gen 1 v gen 2)
Slightly better optics
Commander optics ig (useless)
tusk (straight downgrade)

Allat for a 1.0 br difference

1 Like

i was more talking about the TES being heavier slower and still having worse armour because gaijin is idiotic

also not to mention and this is A BIG PART of it russia faces america and germany quite often and german mains and american mains dont know there ass from there elbow and non pen a t90 most the time

britain faces russia and a t90m having way better protection and being a smaller tank with a lower profile and better gun handling has the advantage 99% of the time

And i’m sure it and the 90M’s performance are totally unrelated to you having better performance in the 90M than in either of the two challengers you mentioned…

Ill be baised but ka 52 best heli

You forgot the turret improvement.
I dont think we should downtier all 12.7s, maybe some of the subpar ones, though M1A1 is more of a 12.0 than an 11.7.

1 Like

They should atleast let you remove the armor.

This isn’t Russia’s fault. Its the US/Ger players.

False. BN MAYBE, but 2E has the advantage.

m1a1 is a 12.0-12.3 tank at 11.7
the Clickbait
the HC
pretty much all the 12.0 abrams should be 12.7

1 Like

Sep had much better armor, as it gets the ha armor

Turret is the same though?


Check in protection analysis.

Literally everything in that sentence is true. The 90M has better protection, is smaller with a lower profile, and has better gun handling.

They should bother to read primary documents and make the armour perform accurately.

1 Like

Those statements don’t give 90M the advantage “99% of the time”.
In a direct frontal engagement where both see each other at the same time sure, 90M has the advantage.
But BN mops at ranges where its APS works and in terrain based fights.

Would be great to get ka52m with magic jammer and lmurs. Alligator >>> havok in terms of appearance. Plus ability fly without tail.

1 Like

Gaijin things ig, just checked and totally right

They should let you remove the armour and fix the challengers armour in general because its a complete mess at the moment

yes that is there fault your correct

and not really false also forgot to say russian tanks dont have a hump over the back and what advantage does the 2E have other than mobility?
worse armour
worse gun
worse gun handling
worse round
worse survivability
the list goes on