Indeed.
Manual guidance system should be last resort like I do, in normal cases auto guiding systems are more than enough.
Did you note how there’s no problem giving Russian plane 500kg F&F bombs at 9.0?
…what about the A4?
its not if they “want to” its a backup of a backup.
its 2 bombs vs 4 and the airframe is much worse.
it gets RWR, bullpups (you can even run an extra 16km one if you sacrifice a TV bomb but keep the other as a tgp) and flares
1 Like
- Who cares? Was talking about SB, obviously.
- And? 2 = 4?? Flight performace of A4 vs Y130 is incomparable.
10_2 bracket ? 4 KABs is not even good loadout at that bracket.
1 Like
I just want the German Mach 7 Roland missile
Buddy it doesn’t matter if its backup or not.
Operator can switch to manual guiding mode and use it anytime he wants.
As a SPAA player I can tell you that Pantsir, much like any SPAA are super easy to kill, first the radar screen is cluttered and it’s super annoying to target multiple missiles, second if you close in, flying low, given the shape of the maps you can sneak on the pantsir and kill it from close range.
Casually ignoring pantsir have guns?? While other top tier spaas are helpless bc of vertical launching.
1 Like
Partly to blame on map design for allowing that
It’s not about the Pantsir being capable of intercepting them, it’s also about how it will affect everybody else in terms of gameplay, combined with the fact that maps aren’t suited for conventional SPAA to effectively counter this since aircraft are almost always able to close the gap.
guns exist
aww, poor you.
It’s still vastly superior to literally any other SPAA.
There’s a reason why top squadrons in SQB take pantsirs over pretty much any other SPAA
2 Likes
Even if the pantsirs didn’t exist, these SPAA would still objectively be bad. There just so happens to be a better option to point a finger too.
People virtually never get killed by any of the normal SAMS in sqb because they always get close enough to disregard it. (which also happens in normal matches)
I have top-tier tanks and aircraft for almost every nation, but Russia is by far the best and easiest one; the BMPT is the best tank I’ve ever played, and on top of that, it sits at 11.7—I unlocked all its modifications just by playing at that BR, and it was incredibly easy. I also own several helicopters, but none compare to the Mi-28NM (which is also extremely easy to use), and the Su-30SM2 with its Kh-38MTs speaks for itself. I feel less and less like playing this game because the favoritism toward Russia is so blatant: while the Abrams gains weight without getting equivalent armor, the BMPT gets buffs to its reactive armor. The only people I’ve ever seen claim Russia is weak are “Russia mains” who have rarely played other nations.
Is that why even the basic M1A1 Abrams is already a superior MBT to any Russian MBT? And why USA is currently on 60-70% global winrates?
Not really true for the vast majority of M1 Abrams models we have.
Ironically, so did the M1’s which are now largely immune to the BMPT’s missiles.
Russia isn’t weak, it’s not as black and white as that.
Their MBT’s are generally quite weak, but they have strong CAS which they have to rely on to win any matches.
Every tech tree has it’s share of strong (BMPT) and weak (T-72B3A, T-90M) vehicles, Russia is no different in this regard.
You are equally bad in every nation you play.
Truely amazing, pls nerf. Well, i guess when you are not going negative in it, there is a point.
You own 2 top tier helis, not “several”
And i am more and more tired of people like you, bellow average players with big opinions but zero stats to back up their claims.
3 Likes