I think what hes trying to say that despite the Mi28 being more effective, Apaches can still spam hellfires, hover over helipads, rinse and repeat.
Regardless if its worse than the Mi 28, its still opressive. (All helicopters are)
i wan’t saying it was better overall but the pros of the puma has compared to the BMPT, like what the PUMA has thats way better, that the BMPT didn’t, not saying the PUMA was better overall
If you think that puma having more pen than BMPT is a pro, that says alot. And the fact that you think hellfires are FnF, jesus dude do a google search
i dont get it - tell me why is the LMUR “biased”? like the only heli in USSR can get 8 max and the AH-64E gets AGM-179 JAGM-MR (IR) air-to-ground missiles and 16 of them but no one really says thats bias?
These would work, but it probably woukdnt satisfy players, but its all they got.
so it’s the angle that makes it biased?
Theyre basically saying the 8 fnf missiles are way more eff3ctive than 16 hellfires that arent fnf
But as I said before. ALL helicopters are guilty of being opressive and apaches having 16 hellfires they can sling at close range is quite opressive.
Again, the important part isn’t trying to match the pantsir SMSV, its to provide some sort of balance
4 Likes
It’s not the angle itself that makes it biased it’s the fact that it’s the ONLY one with this angle while others were supposed to have it first
3 Likes
- flight path makes 8 fnf more deadly then 16 :) (also the missile it self being he vs heat)
- with the mix of the new pantsir it will get even less kills and the mi28 will be protected :)
hellifres suck even close range :) Jagms don’t as much but still getting close range and not getting missiles intercepted is another
Yup, with CIWS vehicles in more trees we would definitely have way less problems with FnF helis and CAS in general
1 Like
Yeah, but granted if these kinds of vehicles have a TWS system that allows them to properly see everything at once.
If not, itll feel like the anti air cv90 where yoi have to manually lock everything
Skyguard has this, a fire test was done where it shot down several drones at once with a burst of air ammunition.
They mustve been closely packed together to destroy a group with a burst… but Ill take your word for it.
Well, whatever seconds one would define as a burst
Modern SPAA not having “TWS” is honestly a red flag as that is the baseline standard for protection against multiple targets. I would be shocked if any of the SPAA Khorne mentioned did nto have “TWS”
Both of them are basically Phalanx systems mounted on trucks, the ADAMS comes with missiles in addition to the Phalanx turret
1 Like
such as u saying Ace crew gives u 6.9secs reload in a Leopard?
u can get a ~6.8secs reload with expert crew.
says the german main that never touched a single russian tank in his life, u didn’t even play them in RB, just KV-7 in arcade as highest BR russian vehicle.
SAP-HE warhead + proper lofting mechanic, that’s why it’s so good.
it will hit the roof of a tank and overpressure it 100% of the time, which the AGM-179 can’t cuz their lofting isn’t modelled.
Yes this is real thing .