I would just hold off hope. Doesn’t seem like anything will change regarding this aircraft.
at least J-10A and J-11B are pretty playable. J-10C is unfortunately pretty pointless compared to A given that you have to choose between two missiles or a fuel tank…
1 Like
one of the downsides of basically not having any internal fuel
unfortunately, yeah.
Well the current fuel is definitely too low. Looking at the layout of the fuel tanks it prob is about 2/3 of what it is IRL, volume wise.
1 Like
When will the J10C’s resistance get fixed
1 Like
The new J-10C is completely unplayable
Proceeds to show us his J-10C that he’s completely spaded…
usa’s f15e use pw220 in real,but they can use pw229 in wt.so the use of AL31F engine for J10C is merely an excuse by Gaijin, they just don’t want to use WS10B for J10C
4 Likes
The truth is that there are Indians within Gaijin, and their Rafales were all shot down.
2 Likes
greatest conspiracy aot
Never, sadly. Its been confirmed its the early batch of J10C’s.
But it’s resistance is still same as J10A
Is there a report open for the drag?
And they took Dassault’s money
How to report though? What sources claims it has lower drag than it currently does? I mean looking at statshark it looks wrong, but how do you prove it?
1 Like
That’s basically why I was asking, if I remember correctly the Rafale got its drag reduced after the supercruise buff report got implemented, to make it able to hit 1.3 M.
Maybe something similar can be done on the J-10 family? I get that it can be hard to report something like drag, but without one open I doubt that devs are gonna miraculously revise the current implementation.
Iirc, J-10 doesn’t supercruise so it’s hard to report from that aspect. In fact J-20 reportedly could not supercruise until it got the WS-15 engines. Others could feel free to correct me.
Then I find it very hard that it’s gonna magically get the drag reduced, the Rafale change as far as I know was directly correlated to the ability to hit M 1.4 supercruise (I think), but then the devs said that 1.3 was all they could do to not give a ridicolously low drag profile to the jet.
My point is tho, a report is needed, that’s all.
2 Likes
Well that’s the issue we have no idea what so ever about its kinetic performance. drag or acceleration.
In terms of report I think a couple were raised for J-10A, but ignored. We were hoping with the amount of changes J-10C made they were gonna redo the entire airframe, but clearly not.
2 Likes
Good news for us J-10C fans :D
6 Likes