We need to wait for a larger sample size IMO. Too soon to tell. Too little data.
Maybe count how many cas missiles the f15 got again the number might surprise you
Let’s not count the wrong labelled free fall missiles
Those are false equivalencies. You have way more games on the Russian hardware. If you played the same number of games on each it would most likely be close to even.
44 games on the M1A1-AIM
1588 games on the T-80U-E1
Who do you think you are fooling?
Likely partially to do with lots of UK players getting an Abrams for the first time
Also, Britain vs US matchmakers
I personally think that’s a “Novelty effect”, new vehicles attract more interest, people return to play the game, for a few weeks or month this vehicle is easily outperforming others purely because of player skill. Eventually the SepV3 tanks will have their numbers lowered to reasonable amounts compared to other vehicles. However I must add that M1A2 Abrams SepV3 armor enhancement is a definition of game changer, frontal arc armor has been increased greatly.
The T80UE1 is t what you are supposed to look at. I made the mistake with that as many do, buying it while i havent got through the tech tree, it was painful as i didnt understand top tier. But fair enough, i apologise for keeping that in the statistics. I will change my previous reply.
The SEP V1 and V2 stats barely moved while the trophy and V3 have massive stats, despite the V1 probably being better than the V3 due to the less weight. I initially thought it could be due to the less games after the update, but their win rates skyrocketed, so they were affected.
I’d be fine with SEPv4 / SEPv3 with v4 upgrades being added at a later date instead of now
Top tier shall feel the wrath of US top tier and their 547,345,987 Abrams spawns
Wait
…
Yall NEED to be careful. E.g. this topic is called “the ABRAMS is too OP”. That’ll add new vehicles that are easily next level OP. (2A8, T14 ARMATA, strv 123A…)
2A8 when its just a heavier 2a7v with less gun depression (as per KNDS’ sheet)
123A when its just a 2a7v
The strv 122 series have better armour than the 2A5+ series. Composite lfp is one of the main things
123A has identical composite layout to 2a7v on the hull? 122b+ (and its subsequent evolution that we have ingame) is the only strv that tried it and it was jst a proposal. the 2a7V has too little armour in warthunder and should easily surpass the 30 year old layout of 122’s but doesnt.
Su-35 is a sidegrade to what Soviets have currently anyway.
Neat Soviet vehicle propaganda image…
All of those vehicles are inferior to Abrams.
I would say there not worse, about equal IMO.
you don’t understand the meaning of this, don’t you?
every single russian tank in that image is massively inferior to even the regular M1A2, hate to break it to you
I honestly think the abrams is just as equal as the competition, maybe the T80Ue1 is worse but its a lower battle rating for a reason, sure the new armor is good but the ZTZ 99A is still good along with the T72B3 and BMPT.
Hate to break it to you top tier russia has more vehicles than in the meme i posted, crazy thought ik. The BVM and 90M are perfectly fine against the SEPv3.

