The new Abrams is too OP

Clearly superior choice when compared to KH38MT slingers. Afterall, if youre good enough, all it takes is one well placed rocket to get a kill, giving this plane much higher potential.

Afterall, our dear friend estabilished that its the quantity that matters, not ease of use and if youre simply good enough you will do better with worse weapon.

But were unfortunately getting slightly offtopic arent we?

3 Likes

Not that it matters. At that range and especially at that angle M829A2 just rips through the T-80U UFP without effort.

1 Like

But you are the one who went for fuel tanks and died. Literally same as people shooting soviet fuel tanks and acting surprised or complaining about bias.

1 Like

Most people are not surprised but annoyed

There is not much he can do, you can see how quickly the Abrams shot him back, or expect him to go after the turret ring area as the chance of not penning there is higher than not going through the fuel tank lol it’s just unlucky that the fuel tank absorbs most of the spalls

Like t-90m, the sides has like four layers of armor, 1. Eras, 2. Armor plate, 3. Spalls liner, 4. Fuel tanks, some shots just has nothing left lol like reduced to atoms

1 Like

Yes but well placed shot will deal much more damage. And besides that breech is also an option especially when you are in position to shoot first.

Sure but aiming slightly below era nullifies all of that. Even 20mm autocannons can punch through t series side in that area.

1 Like

Ok. Next time I’m gonna put /s at the end for you. Sad we did come to this

Not sure. He took a bad shot that he shouldnt have. Fuel take there eats shots. Few inches to the right but still would have been a trade at best, at worst he would’ve still crippled him.

Not like I haven’t seen the exact thing happen in my chally shooting a T series there and furl tank nomming my round.

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

You’re a rather rude person.

You made a bad shot and then tried to blame it as unfair. The fuel tank ate most your spall. Also, he had already pre-aimed at you so knocking out his basket was pointless. I’m also right that had you aimed a few inches to the right you’d have killed his turret crew and the tank.

So go try to rage dunk else where bro.

2 Likes

Notice how the gunner isn’t lined up, the commander isn’t either. Only the driver is a direct hit.

2 Likes

You got flagged for more than good reason I bet. Funny thing is I didn’t even get to see what the hell you put. Bet it was horrible though. Point is, you messed up your shot. Even your buddy who argued with me agreed on that at least. Case closed.

He doesn’t understand fuel in this game depletes spall… If he made that shot on a T-90M it would be even less spall as there is no thin armor wall to create tons of spall from no where. Plus a spall liner. Does that mean the T-90M is OP? Or is the shot placement and positioning not great?

He feels the need to be rude because of his enlarged ego. It sucks that many players are like this in the community causing the game to be of “toxic environment”. Very embarrassing for the outside looking in audience.

2 Likes

Yeah I’ve seen his comments and usually just don’t bother.

My only gripe with T series is that they xan turn their turret after their autoloader blacks unlike everyone else. Though the lack of spall liners being equally rolled out to other nations is annoying too.

He basically said I was an idiot or something because the fuel tank didnt eat his shell. Which wasn’t the point I was trying to make, though I coupd have been clearer.

Idk, I think tech just makes it easier for folks to take whats in their heart and put it out there. But whatever, it’s a game. Gaijin happens to everyone now and then.

There are bulkheads behind Abrams fuel tanks. They create spall again. Maybe since Abrams release but seems it’s too hard to learn

Hey buddy, have you learn how catch frames? For some reason you haven’t answer my question which composites I hit at the side of Abrams hull?

I called a dumb person a dumb person. I don’t have problem with that

US SepV3 has a better round

And you keep calling me dumb but my piont of “a few inches to the right and you’d have hit something more important”… like the gunner… is correct.

Yet you keep calling me dumb over your fuel tank grief.

I’m dumb for mistaking fuel tank funtions, but you’re the arbiter of intelligence… so why can’t you shoot the right spot bro?

Accept you made a bad shot and then posted it to a public forum. So what I said something “wrong” about the fuel tank, folks make mistakes. But since you KNOW you posted a bad shot of your gameplay, but don’t want to OWN that it was a bad shot - you’re going to try and gaslight everyone - particularly me, by focusing on the one thing I said that was just slightly wrong. Ignoring that I CORRECTLY called out your shot placement and told you where the right spot to aim was.

At this point, I am done responding to you. Grow up and chillout.

1 Like

Not that significantly better though.

It is only better against K5, otherwise it’s worse because of significantly worse balistics.

Thats is correct however you forget that Abrams fuel tanks are covered by armor plate, that does creat spalling.
image
image