All you showed is you have good reaction time to press a button. Thats not the skill limit for this video game. Or at top tier ground. Shooting the milliseconds you see something can be good some of the time, not all of the time. If you’re not waiting till you see the meat of his crew compartment spall wise. Or at least positioning yourself in a way where you have MORE AIMING TIME, and a BETTER SHOT too. What’s the point?
If it was the perfect shot, why didn’t he go down vs the clips I’m going to send?
Ehh being close to an Abrams isn’t a skill issue or a problem tho… It was him not maximizing aim time, and not using the geometry of the tanks and map to his advantage. He can’t even help but be relatively close unless you’re saying he should’ve been way in the back and not pushed up. That’s not as productive.
With the T-80Us you have to be somewhat aggressive. If you’re not you just run into many of your faults the tank has. I tried to shy push a Merkava and although I got him crumpled he was able to fire back at me… Is that the Merkava being OP or a skill issue? That’s me having a skill issue. I come back in a T-80UK and just rush him, he misses, I was on point by hitting his gun and took him out with the next two shots.
Point is, your tactics can make a difference.
Because Abrams got new model that randomly can deny spall.
A. I replicated this shit this day… It has 0 to do with the model being different using my angle vs your angle. 90 degrees side on against the Abrams works today using 3bm42 let alone 3bm46…
I surmise that you’re good enough at the game to understand that B. Damage models are inconsistent. If you refuse this point you’d need to argue the Merkava is OP.
C. It was a bad shot. You put yourself in a spot where you took the best you could out of a bad situation & didn’t come out on top. Happens to even the BEST no matter what tank. I’ve non penned an Ariete side composite 90 degrees FLAT with M829A2 doesn’t make the tank OP…
Conclusion: No one (except maybe the Renzo dude) is calling you BAD. Idk why everyone takes criticism on gameplay as a personal insult nowadays…
It had everything to do with new model as old one actually was punishing for missplays while new one is forgiving
It was a perfect shot with driver/gunner/Commander all lined up. Doesn’t matter how many times you show it wrong
Because you make up for random when there’s nothing to talk about gameplay
Even Renzo didn’t agree. He even said your shot was a BAD shot to have to take objectively. I respect his honest for that. If it was truly “perfect” it would’ve one shot the crew… It’s not like you blacked out unprotected hull ammo.
Uploading: video-output-672BFD4E-E76D-49B7-9A46-3D8EF3815112-1.mp4…
Interacting with composite. (Driver, Gunner only). Gamble.
Not interacting with composite. If it was simply the model blocking all spall, why did this work out for me?
The #realperfectshot I suggested in order to avoid pixel hunting snap shot gambles then getting upset that the gamble went in his favor… Case rested.
Your video isn’t uploaded but I know you missplaced it again. What composites? I see you keep writing about composites but my shot didn’t touch composites
2 Likes
Server replay.
Clearly seen flick, clearly seen it’s nothing close to composites, clearly seen it’s no gamble -3. There’s sabot piece hitting lfp with composites not the dart itself
Bro been larping fr fr, chill out since there is no SBMM yet lol
Don’t be entitled as if you are something different.
I’m getting larped by people who can’t even place shot right. I’m getting larped by people who don’t know that Abrams doesn’t have any composites at the left side of fuel tank
Fist of all potency is granted by the sheer amount one can carry.
Considering most complains are focused around speed, it will be quicker to tell you how not to use it …
Strawman argument.
It would be sound to employ it against someone new to WT … i notice you have 8k air rb battles, i have double that and some more. If you can’t at this point judge how to use things and what their effectiveness is without necessarily employing them yourself … what can i say :
Here for you, 3 different techniques to use ( yes GBU-53 not SPICE … it’s the same weapon in terms of gameplay ) :
If quantity was the only denominator for potency then the Wildcat HMA2 would be the best Heli in the game on virtue of having 20 AGMs. Its not tho, because quality and ease of use of the weapon is more important.
The complaints are unreliable damage, Mach 1 drop limitation and the speed of the Spice itself.
People really need to learn what a strawman argument is.
Its not, because when someone
talks about knowledge of using something id expect that person to at least have used said thing once themselves or even better multiple times in different circumstances and not just watched videos of content creators showing the perfect situation since theyre not gonna upload the video where every single Spice gets intercepted and theyre shot down going sub Mach 1 dropping them.
Sick dude. The only thing that video shows is that the potency can only come out if the entire enemy team completely lacks any meaningful air cover. What an amazing revelation that shooting fish in a barrel is easy. Thats like saying the T90M is a better tank than the 2A7V, because it carries more rounds but its only better when the enemy is not fighting back. Its insanely oversimplified.
Yes planes that carry a ton of Spice bombs are awesome for James strat but that literally requires the enemy team to be complicit. Kh38s dont. Theyre less situational, more consistent and easier to use.
Also. No one cares about how many air battles you have in total for this discussion when only a fracture of them is in top tier planes in the first place.
We are talking about F&F AtG weapons ( Kh-38 and GBU-53/SPICE ) , Martel on the Wildcat is SACLOS and requires constant LOS, so again that is either a bad faith argument or your behalf or just lack of basic understanding. In simpler words you are comparing apples to oranges.
Damage is pretty reliable and one shot, from all the drops in my clip i recall only 2 hits not doing damage.
Mach 1 drop limitation is not a limitation if you know how to use it as shown in my video, nor is the speed of the bombs itself. Yes due to their lower speed they can be more easily intercepted ( although after the recent changes made to anti-air missiles Kh-38 can also be reliably intercepted ) but this is where higher numbers for saturation attack come to play ( as shown in my clip at 6:15 the Pantsir couldn’t intercept them all ).
The point is if you expect to play a GBU-53/SPICE bomb like a Kh-38 then the issue is you not the armament.
The video posted above is mine , look at the player ( Raldi92 ).
You didn’t watch the video or is that another bad faith argument ? First clip IRIST, second clip multiple AA , third clip Pantsir and OSA, last clip IRIST, Pantsir , Tunguska etc … ‘‘completely lack of meaningfull air cover’’ .
The point you missed is that after this many battles, you should understand how things work even without playing them yourself simply by observing other players and understanding gameplay mechanics. For example, I’ve never used the Pantsir-SM-SV, does that make my claim that it’s one of the best top-tier SPAA any less true ? Rhetorical question.
If I can effectively use weapons like the GBU-53/SPICE with only a ‘‘fraction’’ of my air battles going towards top tier while you struggle ( you bring up speed as a limiting factor which tells enough ) , you might want to primarily question yourself !
Anyways not worth it going any more back and forth on this discussion , especially when what i get back are primarily bad faith arguments. Take care.
Dude he literally shot you LFP which is a weakspot it was NOT an UFP pen
Abrams fuel tanks are covered by armour plates that produce spall themselves, so it doesn’t matter that fuelt tank itself eats anything.
1 Like
Sure, but while abrams left that encounter victorious, it ended up being crippled.
Spall seems to generate from the bulkhead, just not enough to fully disable the abrams.
I understand the issue, I just dont think this is abrams specific.
Ok perfect so you agree that the properties of the weapon actually matter and its not just a question of quantity. Thats all i wanted to hear.
Its literally a limitation, because it limitates the way they can be used.
“The speed of the bomb is not a limitation. Mentions directly after why its a limitation” Absolute peak.
No one is expecting to do that. But you can play a KH38 in whatever way you want. You cant do the same with a Spice or GBU. Thats what we generally call a limitation.
Sick so your evidence is literally curated by yourself to make your own point.
Yes IRIS T SLM which is wholly inadequate to intercept any ammunition and any team that just lets you do James strat lacks meaningful air cover since James is suicidal if they do like multiple people here already told you. The IRIS didnt even shoot at you and of course a lone Pantsir is not gonna intercept all your AGMs but newsflash it wont intercept 6 38MTs either. So yes lack of meaningful air cover applies absolutely here (also tunguska lmao). Try making the same video against an SM SV, Samp or a team that has a plane clapping you out of your position above the enemy spawn.
Depends on what your claim is based on. Saying that peoples opinion that Spices are worse than 38MTs is wrong, because they dont know how to use them while having used them 0 times yourself is certainly more than questionable. Also its ridiculously embarrasing to pull rank when you dont even have rank.
Who says that im struggling? I know how to use them. I used them in a lot of battles effectively. Im just disagreeing with the part where they are more potent than the 38MT simply based on the part that even your video shows how much incompetence the enemy team needs for them to exceed the effectiveness of something like the 38MT.
Just because you dont actually understand the argument doesnt make it a bad faith argument.
All bad faith arguments i presume?
F111a with 456 ffar
2 Likes