You don’t get it i suck at grb cause im always the lonewolf underdog!1!1!1!
1 Like
Can someone explain how the SEP v3 has the same ammo capacity in it’s 50. cal as the SEP v2, and SIGNFICANTLY more than the regular SEP?
1 Like
Abrams needs buffs, its not OP
1 Like
it can pen my t80bvm!!111 needs nerfff!!11
3 Likes
Most of the people that say the M1’s are now the best MBT’s at top-tier are people who play the M1’s themselves, not T-80BVM players.
Gaijin being lazy with small details. IIRC the standard is still 100 round belts even on the v3.
Only issue then is the game has changed quite a lot over the years, so you couldn’t really compare tanks added 3 years ago with tanks added now
Don’t forget, he could have just smoked, yet he chose to aura farm
it’ called russian bias, bro. it’s always bias until burger king has 146% winrate and 3 kill/spawn average
it is best MBT by all means and stats except “mu hul armr” which, as we see, doesn’t really matter
Oh so are we now gaslighting people into forgetting the bit that gaijin admitted that these changes were made from wrong information and are still to this day incorrect?
I also find it so funny that for like the first 2 weeks of the new M1 release all the ruskie mains were coping because the US WR went up slightly while the RU WR went down slightly.
Good to see that the flavor of the month has expired and everything went back to normal with the US being sub 50% WR and Russia once again sitting right next to the high skill low playercount nations.
1 Like
Probably his personal stat card
3 Likes
My mistake I loaded up the standard page which defaults to global stats.
At the end of the day its still relevant as all the M1s bar the newly added ones which have barely any games played have dropped quite a bit since last week, and Russia is no longer squarely sitting at 40% flat.
I have no statshark data bar planes for June of 2026 so no it should be blank.
Dude, sorting vehicle stats after k/d, the first Russian vehicle is the T80BVM at place 28 lmao.
Stop crying.
If you coun’t SPAA also the SM sits before it on place 26.
3 Likes
literal USmain when he has to aim. do you find ruskeiee weakspots same way you searched for these stats? also main reason why people are pointing on this is again because US (or NATO maybe in general) fanboys were coping about winrates as gigaimportant metric of how bad some techtree is, on top of that they were crying that US didn’t recieve anything significant in this update whereas Russia got mubuff of relikt. so now even by their own logics they were shifting their own pants
Nice job moving the goalposts there, but K/D is irrelevant, especially given the tanks with the best K/D have the least amount of games played and thus have the lowest impact on WR.
EG the E-100 has been at the top of the K/D roster forever but does it suddenly make german 7.7 win, no lol.
Shrodinger’s US tree, can somehow be the best players in the game yet also be the worst. Curious then that M1s are seldom used in the competitive scene unless as tertiary backups, or the fact that the US tree has been sub 45% WR for over 6 years now and only now the US goes positive, when nothing actually changed with the overall lineup beyond having more backups.
Funny too also how Ruskie mains happily complain about WR when it suits them but not when other nations do, most curious.
I would love for you to tell me what actual benefits the new M1s actually bring to the game beyond one vehicle having trophy.
M829A3 does not change any breakpoints, the same weakpoint shots are required, the V3’s cheeks stop the exact same things as the M1A2 from 1986, the hull armor is still useless, the volumetric turret ring now just stops MG fire from killing the tanks through it.
So in the end the US got more backup fodder and one tank with APS, what a amazing improvement that changed … nothing really.
Meanwhile Russia had the overall effectiveness of Relkit, the primary armor of all of it’s top tier tanks it’s tanks, doubled for lateral armor.
Yeah, that is totally a small buff.
1 Like
so stock M829A2 is meaningless
Vehicle comparisons are done spaded not stock so yes stock rounds are irrelevant.
Its nice that top tier tanks now have easier grinds but grind is not something relevant to vehicle capabilities.
Unless you have proof that goes against not only Gaijin’s own math, but the MTC dev’s math and math from community members all using the L-O formula that shows it’s not 370mm’s+ of pen, please show it to me, as right now ingame it’s at WORST underperforming a little bit, but it’s barely breaking 300mm’s of flat pen. (it also overperforms by using longrod slope modifiers but most shortrods do anyways lol)
M735 is rather simply not a good round, like other early apfsds’s 🤷♂️
Also, technically speaking, old M735 had significantly worse angled pen which is what you want in an APFSDS shell, so current M735 is unironically better.
2 Likes