Yeah, because the point you made is adding a fictional plane. The MiG-144 exists, and could, with an inspection, fuel, and anything fixed that needs to be fixed, be in the air.
The talon is a work of fiction, smoke and mirrors if you would.
3 Likes
There is 2 Versions of the MiG 1.44 the paper version which specifies something from Ace Combat and the real version which was lack luster and only flew 2 times.
You stated that the MiG 1.44 would be a Stealth aircraft to add with the addition of the raptor as a competitor.
EVERYONE in the here has stated the idea that this thing has a radar signature return the size of a microwave is unlikely.(INCLUDING YOU)
1 Like
Glad you now understand.
Not that type of ok, but whatever
I’ve just given up, because I just don’t have the time to argue with you.
Anyway,… in comparison to YAK-141 which only added the Fire Weapon System from an early MiG-29 to the Prototype, which already mounted mock-up missiles.
We have the knowledge of nothing of what MiG 1.44 was going to use, most of which are theorical.
- RCS is unknown (and a flat microwave RCS, is FLAT, so Fairly more visible than a Rafale at that point)
- FlightModel is unknown
- Weapon amount and pylons are not implemented on prototype
- Engine used by Prototype (D-30-F-6) are differents from what was planned (AL-41F)
- Avionics is unknown for either Prototype and Theorical Production model
The MiG 1.44 have close to no chances to enter the game.
2 Likes
Just search the official documents instead of talking shit bud. None where build, only a small wooden mock up…
1 Like
Not even a 1.9 tdi from volkswagen?
1 Like
I understand you were going for a joke. But it kind of landed flat and has me confused. Are you saying the 1.9 has a lot of power to weight?
It’s said to have the radar response size of a household microwave. It’s faster than the F-22, it’s lighter than the F-22, has a higher TWR than the F-22. It’s genuinely better than the F-22, and has external weapon stores, meaning it doesn’t have any issues with internal stores with 10-12 hardpoints.
10 Likes
Nvm, don’t worry about it man. It’s an old joke at this point. But to anwser your question: no, a regular 1.9 is pretty terrible in all aspects.
It was soviet, and
I dont need to hear anything else to be 120% sure that, if ever added, this plane will be a death star.
1 Like
Oh i see you talking about when people bore out the 1.9 and make it clapped out. Yeah they get pretty crazy.
1 Like
Sorry for the late reply, this BS for not being active and not allowing posts when I’m in Germany.
+1 cool plane.
Don’t argue with anyone for posting an idea, a suggestion.
It’s a dipshit move.
All it proves is how unintelligent you are.
1 Like
And you were the one arguing?
Your duller than rubber Jesus Christ.
1 Like
He was making a joke about an engine with the twr of 11:1. Far from arguing I am certain him like most people here believe that engine doesn’t exist.
For your second post reply to me. I don’t think that meme means what you think it means. I understood he made a joke. Issue is as he later stated the 1.9 out the crate is complete trash. In power to torque. Even after you put work into it I don’t think it will have a 11:1 ptw.
Your like a marine, mentally dull in every way.
Rather than just being butthurt. Are you going to contribute actual information about this aircraft?
Cough
cough, can’t use common sense
cough, being mad about things never built
This list could include over 20 of your posts about you being butthurt and having to cope and seeth.