I feel concerned that i can’t tell if you are being sarcastic or are serious.
What I’m expecting is people to understand the Mig 1.44 will never be a good fit for WT except as a mod with its cartoon capabilities.
1 Like
Explains the only fly to 1000 alt. If we fly below their radar we are now stealth. This is some wierd cope where i seriously don’t believe you believe that statement.
I’ve already stated this explaining how what they are asking is for a paper aircraft. But I’ve been told countless times no it existed it flew.
I agree with you completely we don’t need these things in WT. Any 5th gen going to be a shit show but this will be even worst cause it speculated stats are fairy dust.
2 Likes
I like how so much of this thread is “my propaganda is better than YOUR propaganda!”
1 Like
Not much tbh. The 144 didn’t exist in any form nearing completion. It was the plane equivalent of a video game engine tech demo. There’s no propaganda in pointing this out.
3 Likes
exactly
what is supposed to be wrong with it? stop acting you are some kind of engineer because you dont seem to understand that stealth aircraft are only stealthy when flying at specific angles to the enemy and your shiny F-35, F-22 and whatever is no different
2 Likes
Meh, tbh it not really worth to argue with this one, if the whole thread is any indication of this
yeah, but he will still yap and then gaijin is going to see his points undebunked and go “according to your feedback … … …” morons like him are why we cant have good stuff
Yep
1 Like
Yes. Except in the case of the F-22 and F-35 it more of angles they are more visible vs the angle they are not. Another factor in them hiding from radar is distance to the radar the further they are the harder they are too see something you will lose from open mounted systems cause you are usually at higher Alt. Hell the F-35 is known and reported when carrying external stores to lose a lot of it’s stealth capabilities you think Mig will be any different?
1 Like
I actually find this article intriguing. Anyway you can get me the sources he listed?
Doesn’t change my opinion that this aircraft was a psyop to instill fear into the west and doesn’t belong in WT.
I also do think this “copy” was built to evaluate these things cause it didn’t have the space or the items listed on the aircraft.
But your article compared to everyone else and even what I could find actually has believable numbers. They contradict in some places but that is why I want to read the sources.
Ka-50 😏
Not saying it was Psyop, but was an entirely new Idea and Concept, which America incorporated many of similar systems to their Apache.
2 Likes
Interesting I’ve seen those as 2 different helicopters that fill the same roll. What systems did the US take from the KA-50 to add to the Apache?
LMFAO no. Let me know what ass you pulled that out of.
1 Like
Time travel, obviously. The Apache’s first flight was in 1975 while the Ka-50 didn’t fly until the 80s.
2 Likes
Fly by wire systems, heavy armor, good survivability, and overall improved targeting systems.
Speaking of that, the Ka-50 is missing 20mm Titanium armor around the cockpit :P
Also; I should I specified that they didn’t literally take these systems, they just incorporated similar systems and ideas into the design.
1 Like
You genuinely don’t know how big of a deal the Ka-50 was to the entire helicopter design industry.
Russian aerospace engineering, specifically helicopter industry have been on the forefront of technology until later years.
Wow, you found the YAH-64 (prototype) first flight…