So we going to manufacture with our imagination 10 to 12 external hardpoints?
Also you aren’t having stealth without internal stores.
Not my words buddy
1 Like
Wow, a 3P source…
1 Like
No, I don’t think they will, but he has to prove they won’t. There is a very real possibility it cannot effectively control airflow caused by the missiles distortion.
Like your cutaway picture? Interesting you scoff at that but will post your own.
Also please enlighten me how you have a stealth fighter without internal stores?
1 Like
From the very beginning, you misjudge the aircraft creation program …
- As a rule, these are usually 6-10 experimental aircraft for testing various systems (for example, Eurofighter)…
- This copy was made to evaluate the Aerodynamic scheme of the aircraft with reserved volumes for 12 missiles inside, as well as 8 points of external suspension and 3 PESA radars…
3.STEALTH technology according to the project was supposed to provide a cold Plasma generator…
5 Likes
surfaces that dont face the enemies dont matter - so if aircraft is flying lower than the enemy, radar wont be able to pick up or will have problems picking up whatever is on the bottom side of the aircraft
1 Like
You know that the reason why the Nord 1500 Griffon 2 will never be added to war thunder is the exact same than here?
The planning for the Nord 1500 Griffon-2 was to get 2 Magic-1 and 2 guns on the aircraft, which haven’t been done after massive testing because the aircraft was finally not chosen to become the new French fighter jet of the time. (Which was Mirage III, from Dassault).
Therefore, there is no reason to add MiG 1.44.
End of discussion
1 Like
so F-35 is also never coming then? or will it just fight against itself
Isn’t the f35 a completed plane that every single nation except Russia can get? Seems like it’ll definitely be added eventually.
1 Like
and what will it fight against?
Balloons
4 Likes
Nah save them for the raptors
3 Likes
The production aircraft (the 1.44 was a demonstrator/prototype for it) was supposed to have internal weapons bay.
At the same time the supposed production aircraft never left paper (or at least never went beyond wind tunnel models). It’s not a Yak141 situation where the aircraft was basically finished and given little founding it could have been put into production in relatively short time.
Still imho it’s better for the game we in general don’t go past early 4+ gen aircraft. Even modelling aircraft that actually exist would be impossible (what even is the performance of an APG-77 or an IRBIS-E??? I’m pretty sure no one can find it out legally). Already the FM of stuff like the gripen, J-10 and Jf-17 is made up in multiple aspects, no need to push things further.
1 Like
SU-57 ain’t complete? Su-75 ain’t more complete than MiG-1.44?
There is several options already, stop vitching around the facts, that currently we don’t have any clues what could be a MiG 1.44 as it never was build in it’s intended form.
Let alone the fact that we have no data on the whole Avionic suite, the flare/chaffs dispensers, and the real pylons as those weren’t designed on the first prototype that ever flew at limited capabilities?
Nord 1500 Griffon -2 was a complete proto-aircraft that we have entire knowledge of what was on the aircraft, and intended for weaponized version → this one have been denied, so is MiG-1.44
End of bullshit.
4 Likes
“The su-57 ain’t complete!”
This:
That’s two stealth planes vs one, this is to balance that out.
well, Su-57 would work initially, but eventually it will come to higher tiers expansing, and more aircraft will be introduced
you guys could also get like… F-22 or something
Read again boy, it was a “?” Not a “!” At the end of my QUESTION.
So,… i don’t know what you’re on about?
Next time use the Quoting system.
Also there is Su-75 as told already
As F-35,… i mean nothing would prevent the F-35 to go to higher BR as the Su-57.