why would that be? we have numerous aircraft in game that can and have external aam load
edit: i mean - what makes this aircraft different?
It’s the fact that it “wasn’t loaded with missiles” and therefore “adding them could make it stall”
thats some high drag missiles right there bruh ☠️
2 Likes
We have a few major examples of aircraft with similar configuration that have not issues, I don’t see why this one would have any, it already has pylons.
1 Like
i think he is just playing a lawyer
The MiG 1.44 could be a good cap for the MiG line, just like the Su-57 Felon will be the cap for the Sukhoi line.
1 Like
If you could produce factual numbers for it.
As of right now we have the engines are claimed to have 44,000 lbs of force with a twr of 11:1
When has production numbers ever effected if a vehicle is added or not?
So we going to put in a fake stats aircraft made off of vaporware? Can’t wait to see this Ace Combat UFO.
It’s not entirely fake, and it wouldn’t be the first time gaijin did this, I’m all for it.
1 Like
Yeah the R2y2. That wasn’t controversial at all.
1 Like
The R2Y2 also never existed, not even in a prototype, R2Y1 existed though.
The result that was suggested to the game doesn’t exist.
What does exist is an aircraft with 2 pylons. Capable of 500 kmh and making an alt of 1000.
1 Like
Show me a image of the R2Y2 with jet engines.
Show me an image of an mig 1.44 with internal weapons bay.
1 Like
No one ever said it has an internal weapons bay…
1 Like
I’ve actually seen an image of the aircraft from a bottom view when it was doing its flight, it has some sort of compartment there.
Something interesting I just found
A better view
Doesn’t have an internal store but it does have something akin to the AIM-7 stores on the F-15, central mounted
4 Likes
Come again.
1 Like
The only thing below the fuselage is the intake and engine.