https://tr.rbxcdn.com/b3eddf4094dae8a8e07e76e0c58e90a3/420/420/Hat/Webp
Oh wow you found images of 2 Swedish fighter jets
Still doesn’t prove to me the missiles won’t affect the flow of air, because maybe, just maybe, you need lift to fly.
2 Likes
what exactly is the discussion here?
if i understand correctly, you think that loading aam’s externally is supposed to somehow make aircraft unable to fly?
No, I don’t think they will, but he has to prove they won’t. There is a very real possibility it cannot effectively fly with ordinance.
why would that be? we have numerous aircraft in game that can and have external aam load
edit: i mean - what makes this aircraft different?
It’s the fact that it “wasn’t loaded with missiles” and therefore “adding them could make it stall”
thats some high drag missiles right there bruh ☠️
2 Likes
We have a few major examples of aircraft with similar configuration that have not issues, I don’t see why this one would have any, it already has pylons.
1 Like
i think he is just playing a lawyer
The MiG 1.44 could be a good cap for the MiG line, just like the Su-57 Felon will be the cap for the Sukhoi line.
1 Like
If you could produce factual numbers for it.
As of right now we have the engines are claimed to have 44,000 lbs of force with a twr of 11:1
When has production numbers ever effected if a vehicle is added or not?
So we going to put in a fake stats aircraft made off of vaporware? Can’t wait to see this Ace Combat UFO.
It’s not entirely fake, and it wouldn’t be the first time gaijin did this, I’m all for it.
1 Like
Yeah the R2y2. That wasn’t controversial at all.
1 Like
The R2Y2 also never existed, not even in a prototype, R2Y1 existed though.
The result that was suggested to the game doesn’t exist.
What does exist is an aircraft with 2 pylons. Capable of 500 kmh and making an alt of 1000.
1 Like
Show me a image of the R2Y2 with jet engines.
Show me an image of an mig 1.44 with internal weapons bay.
1 Like
No one ever said it has an internal weapons bay…
1 Like