The MICA EM should have its range fixed due to the addition of AIM-120C-5 in the game on multiple platforms

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Turns out when you try to act like the victim while having the objective best jet in the game, people don’t roll on their bellies for it. (except for Gaijin apparantly)

2 Likes

Thread going full off topic because 3 guys are obligated to debate which country between US and France is best weapon seller in the world. This is a thread for a MICA buff these talk have nothing to do here.

Muh. AMRAAM GONNA BE OP! NOOOO

Gaijin’s honest reaction:

Everything making the C-5 is not in the C-5

7 Likes

yep only better than the C at 20km + now and even then not by very much

Forced reliance and they left equipment there. Otherwise Israel just has a hand in American dealings (they already have a history if stealing stuff like the Mirage III), Saudi Arabia just wants it because they get money out of it, and NATO reliance.

Also, if it was so good, the Soviets would have just copied it in general. They took the philosophy, but that’s like saying that Americans are Evil Windmill Germans because they copied and pasted multiple German weapons (STG-44 to M-16 and FG-42 to M-60 if I remember correctly), and that Americans were in love with the monarchy (Gewehr 98 to M1903)

are you saying that an over 40% market share means nothing?
image

1 Like

stg 44 and m16 are seperate, iirc it was mg42 to m60. but i only said design philosophy, i dont see where you get the “soviets loving US govt/military” and german comparisons from

Asian countries are not forced and the weapons were not left behind in singapore, malaysia, etc.

anyways, can we at least agree MICA buff makes sense since realism is generally a good thing for weaponry?

Bug report it instead of complaining here.

Yeah, it makes sense. I’m just tired of hearing “American number one” as a justification for America getting unnecessary buffs.

thierry-henry-laugh

1 Like

That’s funny because we’re in a complaint thread right now and I don’t think it’s for the AMRAAM…

💀
Good luck actually getting it accepted.
Even if it gets acceped it will need at least 1 year until fix


Well, if you think that’s not realistic, do a bug report instead of cope? Or maybe arguing using your real account?

7 Likes

The problem with “Unrealistic” drag of Rafale is because Typhoon didn’t have it, and instead got denied as the meme “Marketing Lie”.

Idk how that is supposed to be French Main fault. The amount of cope is insane.

5 Likes

Except that in the backstage all the reports for this buff are made and structured and even upgraded with fresh sources for over a year now so it only make sense to make dev server threads to ask for the buff to be actionned. And if you were smarter it’s not a complain thread it’s a thread made to require something in reaction to the addition of another thing i don’t see where it is complaint. Some people like me do complain i agree but don’t go making this thread look for what it isn’t re-read the first message no sign of complaint there.

4 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

I made a thread under the dev server category just now on how Gaijin can just fix the performance of the PL-12, and not have to add PL-12A.

1 Like

Thanks to @_OceanFish for bringing it to my attention

Eurofighters will be receiving AIM-120Cs so hopefully people will support MICA EM to get fixed now surely?

11 Likes

@Smin1080p_WT Any response from devs on whether they’ll be reviewing MICA EM’s range report?

7 Likes