Bug report it instead of complaining here.
Yeah, it makes sense. I’m just tired of hearing “American number one” as a justification for America getting unnecessary buffs.
1 Like
That’s funny because we’re in a complaint thread right now and I don’t think it’s for the AMRAAM…
💀
Good luck actually getting it accepted.
Even if it gets acceped it will need at least 1 year until fix
Well, if you think that’s not realistic, do a bug report instead of cope? Or maybe arguing using your real account?
5 Likes
The problem with “Unrealistic” drag of Rafale is because Typhoon didn’t have it, and instead got denied as the meme “Marketing Lie”.
Idk how that is supposed to be French Main fault. The amount of cope is insane.
3 Likes
Except that in the backstage all the reports for this buff are made and structured and even upgraded with fresh sources for over a year now so it only make sense to make dev server threads to ask for the buff to be actionned. And if you were smarter it’s not a complain thread it’s a thread made to require something in reaction to the addition of another thing i don’t see where it is complaint. Some people like me do complain i agree but don’t go making this thread look for what it isn’t re-read the first message no sign of complaint there.
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I made a thread under the dev server category just now on how Gaijin can just fix the performance of the PL-12, and not have to add PL-12A.
1 Like
Thanks to @_OceanFish for bringing it to my attention
Eurofighters will be receiving AIM-120Cs so hopefully people will support MICA EM to get fixed now surely?
11 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT Any response from devs on whether they’ll be reviewing MICA EM’s range report?
7 Likes
Was about to ping you with this. The addition of this weapon’s just created a mess. Should have been stuck to the F18s and no one would have had issues. Now there’s going to be issues that it’s arguably wrong, yet still a far sight better than the kit of folk without it.
7 Likes
Yeah I had no problem with F-18s getting AIM-120C, I have never considered them a serious threat in an air RB match, and instead a small annoyance, but the F-15E/Is were also getting them and also now the Eurofighter.
1 Like
If it was limited to F18s, it wouldn’t really matter to have MICA (or other missiles) improved on account of the F18s being able to provide sod all additional launch energy. But it coming to platforms like EFT and the F15s warrant MICA being brought up to par. It is a medium range missile with dogfight capability by design, it is a travesty that the competitor come in and MICA still be limited to a short range dogfight missile if you want it to connect with a target.
Would also note the argument that range doesn’t matter which has been used to say long range missiles are worse off would mean that MICA receiving an improved range should not be as problematic as people are crying over, if their logic were consistent.
1 Like
It’s a reactionary thread because you guys are complaining that the MICA will be outclassed when the C-5 is added. Completely ignoring that maybe, just maybe the game isn’t ready for this so called unnerfed MICA.
1 Like
Sigh. Gaijin has no feel for balance. Why can’t they just fix it’s dang radar and move on…
1 Like
Seems like C-5 were nerfed heavily too
We shouldn’t have problems with reactionary threads if there’s good and compelling arguments.
That might have been valid for the previous C5, now the reworked is just an 120A/B w less drag and a slightly extended motor, with the same maneuverability and ease to be notched.
Well, this turns out to be true. Moreso considering that 120C5 won’t be as threatening + they’re already eating decently with the offbore MEM slinging.
1 Like
This is why the thread was made, we already knew what was coming.
1 Like