can i change my opinion after seeing that, mica don’t need more range, its fine right where it is…
1 Like
They did and they made it worse, so now they have just completely forgotten about Typhoon.
Gaijin wanted ti make sure Rafale was superior to Typhoon they added a more modern version of Rafale with the best Radar it could have, the best power plants it could have. They have it more missiles the more advanced HMD system.
Superior CAS payloads.
Gaijin could have made an attempt to level it up.
But have actively made a choice not to
What gaijin need to do is to improve the MICA range by fixing thurst vectoring (which would also fix r77) and MASSIVELY reduce the off bore shooting capability of the MICA because this
is the worst joke i ever saw in a long time.
Oh and btw, they need to fix the Rafale engine : it cannot go mach 2 (stated by Dassault) and it cannot supercruise (i have to dig aroud for that one but i think it was also stated by Dassault and i think it can find testemony of a Rafale pilote conferming that the Rafale does not have this ability) and this can be done whithout running into the game engine limits because once upon a time the Rafale had its correct top speed and wasn’t able to supercruise but for some reason gaijin thought it was a good idea buff that part of the Rafale FM ( i swear to god if they continue to make stuff up i am really goining to eat a bunch of snail just to feeel better)
Yes they should have added a F2 variant instead of a mid/late F3 variant
r-77-1 also got this buff, it’s not just mica.
How is it not able to go mach 2 if the rafale a was able to go mach 2, that makes 0 sense.
Exactly we basically have a Rafale F.4
When we could have had a Rafale with a PESA Radar
1 Like
RAM coating limitations is why Dassault limit it 1.8
Well, it doesn’t get that coating in game. Also, where did you get that info from.
It has the coating in game it just doesnt offer the RCS reductions.
The mass is the exact same in game as it is in the real world
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Wait until you hear about the Challenger 2
They litereally made up sources to nerf it.
So you’ll have no issue with the Tpyhoon being MASSIVELY buffed then.
CAPTOR-E for example?
So AIm-120A/B buffs let alone Aim-120C5s for the Typhoon?
You mean that the Typhoon is being artificially nerfed and the Rafale is being artificlally buffed?
Sure. I gotta love the french main cope right there. So Any issue with the Typhoon getting the Captor-E radar then as the Rafale skipped its PESA radar? Or will the french mains complain that CAPTOR-E is too good and would be unfair again? like they have been for months
Ah yes. Britain, Germany and Italy have been rolling in competitive aircraft
Yes, we know ,the Typhoon is better IRL, in pretty much every single respect. Which is why the Rafale has to be artificially buffed and the Typhoon artificially nerfed
So get over it. We all know the Rafale actually has a load of nerfs due and the Typhoon has a load of Buffs due.
1 Like
Rafale beats Eurofighter in exports not by much.
And the biggest 3rd party operator has the Navalised version.
Rafale is very good, but so is Typhoon.
Its not copium it is widely regarded as one of the best Gen 4.5 airframes.
This isnt bitter Typhoon mains trying to nerf Rafale we just want balance and as it stands Rafale is newer, faster, deadlier and better in every way.
Did i missed a /s somewhere ?
what do you mean ?
“/s” is used to show that a message has sarcastic intent
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Now I know you are trolling…Another one that believes French Rafale bug report quality is the reason Rafale has received constant buffs.
Can we go back to on topic and talk about the main topic of this thread…