You’re using an inferior source of data to mine and still want to argue about it.
Ignorance at it’s finest.
They might’ve been better years ago, but in 2025 (before the DIRCM and LMUR addition) ? Don’t think so.
In the last 7 months UHT held it’s own against those two, despite having unusable missiles.
Glad we have access to a tool that monitors games from who knows many players, yours included. Based on this I can say 122B+ is indeed better than BN.
It pretty much was the best thing major nations could offer in the past several months.
The point being, it can still easily kill tanks, as shown by it’s stats.
I don’t need to have anything if I have stats from thousands of players (yours included) at my disposal. Those stats pretty much busted your myth of PARS being some godawful missiles, they simply aren’t even if you wanted them to be in order to have a “reason” to cry your eyes out on the forum.
The problem with Spikes and PARS is that they both lack their top attack trajectories for “balance” yet LMUR and Kh-38 take this balance decision out the window. I think everybody wouldn’t mind untapping the capabilities of those missiles now that LMUR is in the game and it’s pretty much an orbital strike like Javelin.
Ngl I just want 2 things.
Cool? Still doesnt perform crazy compared to the other helis.
The point being that “its able to kill tanks” is not a valuable statement without comparing it to other weapons in the same class. If hypothetically the LMUR MI had double the KD of the UHT then it would be apparent that it can not “easily” kill tanks.
Oh come on don’t put any excuse stats even say 52 even better than UHT so if according by your standards that mean it does no other way around so i was right that 52 and 28 NM are better than UHT even before they have FnF by your logic here
That why i laugh at you lol you don’t even have them yet trying to show that you know lot more about stuff to the people who actually have them by throwing stats
Who the real ignorant here?
Well then mine and those players stat said PARS is even worse than vikhr because both lot of players and i have better stat in Vikhr right?
Performs more than nicely for something that apparently has godawful missiles.
No, it would be apparent that LMUR can kill tanks better or the vehicle itself can survive better as deaths influence that metric as well.
Why is the concept of comparison such a hard one for you to understand? Saying something is godawful is useless in a vacuum which is why you need a comparison to a similar type of weapon. And since the title of this thread is quite well visible it should be fairly obvious what PARS is being compared to.
I’m not excusing anything, did you read my sentence at all ?
Stats clearly indicate that, from February to August, UHT is clearly neck and neck with the “almighty ones”. Last time when I checked we’re in 2025, not 2021 or 2022.
It’s still you that is ignorant as you’re valuing your own stats more than the stats from thousands of players. I’m just here to read out the numbers and confirm some things.
It’s either ignorance or a simple language barrier.
Read my first paragraph.
Well unlike you i can actually compare the stuff i have and can tell which one better which one worse I don’t dare to act like i know lot much about stuff I don’t really have especially not against people who actually have it
Valuing my own stats?
stats is the thing I rarely mention it first i even try to avoid to mention it first if possible unless someone starts it (which is there always going to be)
Not really, as something would be godawful if it can’t do the thing it’s supposed to, regardless of how well it’s peers are doing. Your missile failing to kill tanks makes it useless indeed.
As funny as it might seem, some things can be the best in the group but still be considered godawful at their job, as being the best at something doesn’t mean anything.
I think terms like personal opinion and such are alien to you, or your ego is through the roof so you think your opinion is somehow an objective statement.
I’m just reading out the stats and your claims of PARS being garbage tier with piss poor damage simply don’t hold up to scrutiny. I actually presented you data that have your stats included in it, but you still think your opinion is superior.
WT forums are gold.
It called “experience” in PARS case is something you lack while I don’t.
the stats actually do point to PARS not doing much, look at the ration of K/B to K/D
The problem is just that then you dont have a baseline to compare it to which makes the everything arbitrary. Right now the UHT has 1.8 kills per death so if we assume that every tiger fires all of its missiles before dying thats a 22.5% killrate or 4.44 missiles for a kill. Is that good? Is it awful? Thats impossible to say without a comparison, because you make up whats awful or good for you.
Debatable. The UHT barely stands out statwise in an environment where it had one of the only FnF missiles and had the most potent SPAA on its side
And your personal experience doesn’t need to align with objective facts.
Good thing Statshark has compiled experiences from thousands of players and nothing indicate that PARS has piss poor damage.
Oh then why you don’t admit that Vikhr overall is better than PARS? statshark even said so by stats all the times yeah i say that Vikhr better than PARS too because i use it overall better than PARS why don’t you agree with me in this case?
K/S metric will always have lower scores than K/D for obvious reasons.
Even helicopters slinging off mega uber nukes called Vikhrs suffer from the same faith and don’t stand out in any way.
quiet lil bro you just don’t get it