You know, You can first destroy his gun or attack him while he is reloading?
It can’t do anything to the Maus even from the side.
Both can at 0m. Will never happen ingame.
230mm max pen vs 232mm of armor. It’s impossible to pen. Again you can gamble the pixel weakspot with HE but it’s not a realistic shot to hit and is entirely up to luck.
Never said there was a problem with the Maus having strong armor but it’s still a fact they can’t pen it anywhere.
If it was 7.0 it would still have no chance at killing a Maus.
I don’t where this is suppose to lead.
Yes, it’s possible but the likelyhood of that happening is near 0, so what’s the point?
Imagine that any tank could penetrate a Jagdtiger from 100m, if the angle was between 0-5°.
How often would players be in range to do that?
Not impossible due to RNG pen modifiers. But It’s not reliable. At 100m it’s probably a 50% chance or less.
If You get close enough, APCR can pen his side and ammo-rack him.
Of course it will, done that.
Game analysis allows You to simulate it and there is a chance of penning.
AMX-13 can pen his side if he gets close enough, same situation as T-44.
Frontally? It shouldn’t as 7.0 light tank.
So it is possible to pen it, that was the case, not how reliable it is.
The APHE shot is 100% impossible and HE is random damage depending on the pixel it hits.
It is possible, You can even check that in game.
The APCR will most likely not even set of the ammo.
Prove it.
Do it ingame.
Frontally it can’t.
Doesn’t matter if it should be able to or not. That was never the point.
Any tank can get killed by anything if they drop down from above and shoot the roof. Is it possible? Yes. Does it happen? No.
Do it.
Well yeah, they can pen frontally, but so can the Maus.
Because?
This is from protection analysis and this is what will happen in game (sorry, not gonna spend a lot of time just to have 1vs1 fight with a maus in such vechicle.
Yeah but still pointless to discuss.
The discussion should be: Which vehicles can effectively penetrate the Maus.
Otherwise it’s like a He-51 can shoot down a Mig-15 discussion.
Of course such discussion is pointless.
But that was the statement:
So it is not if this vechicles can effectively fight Maus frontally, but that they can’t do “nothing” and another statement:
If the discussion was different then what I write would also be, but for such statements I will respond the same way.
For me Maus is nothing special.
1 Like
It’s APCR.
This is something you can do in protection analysis but it’s simply not going to happen if you actually fight a Maus.
Range: 0m
Doesn’t change anything.
Again, it will happen if You get close enough.
Doesn’t change anything and is possible if You get close enough
This is 7.0
- it can turn faster than the maus with its slow turret
- 50 cal
- equal gun
- impenetrable armor
- no frontal weakspot
Its just slower than the maus, but everywhere better.
1 Like
No frontal weakspot lmao. The massive cupola where people oneshot you, giant muzzle break where everyone shoots to break your gun, and then detrack and flank you.
3 Likes
no frontal weakspot
Maybe you should try again and think about that weak spot by shooting at the cupola
T95 bounces like hell off the Maus I had to wait for a side shot
The frontal weak spot is the gun and the cupola .I have had shells come in through the cheek each side of the gun ,just like anything its redundant in the uptier if you face the wrong thing .
The only thing with the T95 is it fits the canon at 7BR better where as the Maus sticks out like a Bulldogs balls being an Old WW2 prototype.
I suppose by the time you see the Maus any player would have given up in reality and immersion or quit.
Personal I would get rid of it and have it as a rarity like it used to be.The whole game screams WoT currently.