heres one yeah the sherman with extra armor and a 76 mm cannon is equal not 4.0 one
no i meant the 75mm one. they are equal:
both have 75mm guns
both have 5 crew
both have tracks
both have wheels
both contain metal
next point you would like to contest?
panthers 75 is far higher velocity far eclipsing the shermans 75
yeah there both made of metal why would you make them same br it makes zero sense
1 Like
should m60 be same br as mark V tank because there made of metal ?
1 Like
well the mark v has 20 dudes and 2 guns its potentially stronker compared to m60 with only 4 dudes and 1 gun
[quote=“kcns, post:89, topic:231050”]
yes my dude its fair what do you expect? want to enlighten the class on how fair it is for panther to fight t26e5?
very intresting logic so because t80 has 3 crew and char 2c has 18
char 2c should be 11.7 ?
yea and theres enough space in the char 2c to get a stripper for the 18 dudes to enjoy. idk about u but id rather be in my stripper equipped char 2c than a cramped ass t80
ok now that this point is proven, NEXT?
Its not, the average Sherman m4a1 has bad armor and bad gun. What a dumb comment.
Yeah, even solid shot one shots because of the ammo in the back of that turret.
Well the char 2c will also be cramped too. Why? Cause there are 18 dudes in a tank. But you comparing a modern tank to a post ww1 tank. I wounder why half of your comments are flagged?
very
not to mention stuff like the t20 is 6.0 or 6.3 (i cant remember) and should not be and the M4A3E8 76W is 5.7 and can face Tiger II’s. and its barely better than the 5.3 br M4A2E8
Why do people keep saying t20 doesn’t deserve to be 6.3 lmfao. Compared to hellcat it gets a stab and doesn’t die to HE/50cals while maintaining great mobility. Unironically one of the strongest 6.3 tanks when you play it as a LT instead of trying to front fight everything
1 Like
There’s no such tank. 
On a serious note, I disagree. The M4A3 gets almost a 25% increase in hp/ton, making it far more responsive and maneuverable. It loses 5 km/h of top speed, but acceleration matters more in almost every scenario.
1 Like
i mean the “easy 6” variant of the M4A2, i was thinking about the M4A3
sure but it can still face tiger 2’s, which i dont believe is fair
all it is, is a short sherman, yet its a full BR higher than the M4A2 76W. I play it, i do well in it. but only being 1 step behind all the heavies at 6.7 or MBT’s at 7.0 or 7.3 with a 76mm. it can be rough
a short Sherman
oh yea fixing the shermans mobility issues with no drawback is just a “short Sherman” lol
Not sure what this thread has devolved into but I have no idea why people are saying it’s 6.7 material when it’s clearly not. But it is also not 6.3 material as it’ll be extremely good. It’s in a limbo right now and the only way to fix it is to expand the max BR and then recalculate the BR of the tanks in that bracket. What we should not do is raise the BRs (without decompression) of tanks at 6.7 because then it’ll make those tanks struggle and we’ll see another post just like this talking about how ___ tank should be at a lower br.
@kcns I think everyone here is talking about how it performs in GRB not GAB. I find it ironic, when you tell people to “get gud” when all you play is arcade which is hand-holdy to say the say the least.
1 Like
- more people play GAB than GRB
- GAB is a much more accurate measure of tank performance than GRB since its always mixed battles and you cant kneecapped by having to deal with X nation mains
- GRB is the most handheld mode in the game basically boiling down to cas simulator lmfao. at least you have to actually get kills in AB to call in airstrikes
