definitely an upgrade tho
So? Look at the Aussie vehicles in the British tree post WW2.
Such as 99% of their stuff going into the British tree
Their stance has always been along the line of “we’ll add Canadian and Australian to whichever tree we see fit”.
Where did I say anything about the Commonwealth? Australia is literally a British realm is what I said, the British king is Australia’s king.
1 Like
But obviously, Gaijin only caters to the side with the strongest community support. The VT4, China’s foreign trade tank exported to Thailand, still belongs to the Chinese tech tree, while the M1A2T, the U.S. foreign trade tank exported to China, does not belong to the U.S. tech tree but the Chinese one. It can be seen from this that Gaijin doesn’t care who sells it or who buys it; it only assigns them to the side with the strongest community support.
Why would the UK mains want a tank with an exposed turret ring and the basket that can be disabled by the slightest threat possible and horizontal pump that catches fire and needs 30sec repair time and it can kill you if you don’t extinguish it in a matter of seconds.
Also forgot to add no spall liners, but you get better mobility and 5 sec reload buff that nobody asked for.
Cope harder lol. The only reason BAE is any good is because of all its American business and all the American defense companies it ended up buying and still operates out of (LM Sanders for EW, United Defence for ground vehicles, etc.)
And as for the Abrams,
- Britain absolutely shouldn’t get it, especially if they didn’t like it
- A crew checking it out isn’t enough for addition
God damn these copium filled threads are popping up like mushrooms after rain.
3 Likes
For some reason i have a feeling the Devs are gonna copy paste the Sepv3 when its added to both The US and The UK through Australia since they have no other tanks to get otherwise.
i mean, sure, i agree with that sentiment - but it doesnt change the fact that the AIM isnt in the british TT.
until gaijin decides to move AIM to the UK or make australia an official subtree, their stance on australia is clear.
not saying its right, but cards are given.
yea. “screw the aussies and canadians”
3 Likes
The UK already uses a bunch of Australian vehicles so its not like they need to make an official announcement to add another one to the UK.
The same tank has been in 2 different nations at the same time before like the Merkava’s for example and the Ito in France and sweeden both being the same tank from Finland
how? they should be grateful to even have vehicles in the game since they arent a tree or subtree. adding them to a logical place like the US or UK depending on the vehicle isnt screwing them over. for example the AIM and the new event tank
sure, they dont need to make official announcment for another australian vehicle in the UK TT. But its more likely than not said vehicle wont be Abrams.
I wouldnt use Israel as example since US Merkavas, as well as other israeli premiums in the US, french and UK TT predate standalone israeli TT.
Sure, but at least with Ito it can be argued its french weapon system anyway, so connection is there.
id be more than happy for gaijin to remove the 2A4M from germany and add it to the UK, and offer a refund to those who bought it.
1 Like
I honestly think sometimes people forget a lot of nations they like just dont have enough unique equipment to make their own nations in game. And honeslty Thats kinda my take on isreal too ngl they should have been a US subtree as the nation realy only has like 1 line worth of unique vehicles.
1 Like
they havent even moved the british grant premium over from america when britain is the biggest minor nation now. They arent gonna do that with the canadian leo
2 Likes
guess im stuck with it then lol.