No thanks
We literally bought one, its game
Trialled it, realised we could do something better for our needs and made the Challenger 2
Didn’t they just test it out with one of their crews
And the US bought a Leopard 2 to compete with the XM1, yet didn’t get it in game. The UK doesn’t need an Abrams.
And not only did the US buy a Leopard 2, it was built modified for US specifications. It wasn’t a production tank.
Again it’s not about needs when will you people get it into your heads. A like to have =/= needs
1 Like
Ok, I want a Eurofighter with Meteors for the US tree before anyone else gets Meteors.
Remember what our mothers used to say, I want doesn’t get : )
Needs = A reason for it’s existence
Like = A hope
Want = Demands
1 Like
There was a crew that tried it out in 1989 in germany and the review was… mixed. things loved but just as many things hated. That was a seperate instance of testing/trialling.
America never Bought a Eurofighter and dont own any meteors. I get it the US cant build good planes anymore and especially good missiles but you cant get ours as compensation.
4 Likes
ooof
1 Like
the F22 was incredible. but its screwed as soon as its not a BVR situation and the F35 is a joke of an aircraft, i rue the british ever being involved in that flying pig project
1 Like
As the EU buys F35s.
American F-35 can be equipped with meteor as it recently tested an inert meteor which means it could be compatible with it and according to gaijin, If it is compatible it would be added. (This is for whenever F-35 is added). Also you are forgetting about aim 260 and aim 174b
This is hilarious.
through gaijins rather loose ideas of what goes where the american F35 could see meteor but it wouldnt be realistic for an operated aircraft by the branch.
has the JATM and Gunslinger actually been accepted into service yet tho? As far as i know the USA is still stuck on AMRAAM and 9X
I am pretty sure AIM 174B has entered service as for aim 260, no
The AIM-260 is in production. The AIM-174 is fully in service.
Australia is part of the Commonwealth, but that’s about it.
If your entire argument is “buh but it’s part of the British Commonwealth, and therefore it has to only go to the British Tech Tree,” then your argument is incredibly dumb as heck. Going by this logic, then every vehicle any country had captured shouldn’t be in their tree. As it makes no sense, as it wasn’t theirs.
It’s been official denied as a sub tree.
So no matyer how hard you trie you aren’t going to cope it into existence.
Cope. Lol. As if that means anything to me.
Gaijin change their stance all the time.
Of course coping means something to you, you do it all the time.
Yeah and they have been pretty consistent with their stance on Australia and Canada over the years.