Difference is one nation bought the test vehicle and the other didn’t
The UK bought an Abrams and then gave it back for free?
Called a lease
So they acquired an Abrams for testing and returned it after the tests were done, just like the Leopard 2AV, which isn’t in the US tree.
Sounds like the M1A2 shouldn’t be in the UK tree.
British;
- Ownership (temporary)
- Crew
- Testing
Makes more sense than the Kungstiger…
And all of that applies to the Leopard 2AV trialed against the XM1, which is in the German tree.
The M1A2 should not go in the British tree.
Makes perfect sense the same as the M1A1 AIM to the UK (AUS players shouldn’t be penalised for the 17/1 spit of their vehicles in game)
Australian players are no more penalized for the AIM being in the US tree than US players are for our vehicles being in basically every other tree.
Your just using that one screenshot to justify stuffing an Abrams in the British tech tree when the most they did was rent one for a bit
No this was about the AIM, keep up
Still using that screenshot to justify a vehicle that isn’t British operated and isn’t a British subtree in the British tree. They don’t need to spam the Abrams to the UK
Asking for 1 Abrams = Spamming an Abrams.
Incredible mental gymnastics
They don’t need to add it either way, and they shouldn’t
They gave it to China which is bad enough already
US didn’t need the AIM by that logic then
It’s an American tank though. That is a false equivalent.
It’s like not adding any more Challengers to the UK because “they already have them”
The challenger thing has been the case for years, you know that right
Didn’t they add the CR3 TD? And they probably will add a production one the next big MBT update
The tank that isn’t a CR3? Yeah they added that
I mean let’s be honest, as soon as Gaijin adds the AIM to the British tech tree the British mains will go for the Canadian Leo 2A6. And when that is in game the British mains will go for the Australian SEPv3.
It’s just what nation mains do.
