Kinlar tank operated by Largur
2 Likes
Exactly, now would Kinlar still has the right to say what Largur can do with these tanks ?
1 Like
depends on the terms of the sale
So if say Kinlar can do what Largur can please with these tanks basically do what you want we don’t care anymore, would those be fully Largur operated tanks ?
1 Like
well yeah. but that doesnt really have anything to do with WT implementation. the Abrams is still an American tank
I had enough playing now, I need to sleep
1 Like
Depends, did this Kinlar ever service it? Or modify it at any point.
Example: (ČKD) LT vz. 38->Germany made many different variants.
So it’s still Czech in origin; however, the variants that shot off are German.
+3
1 Like
good night
1 Like
Think again. Here is the M1A2 the UK bought in the 90’s to see if it was a suitable replacement for Challenger 1. The bid failed and the tank was ultimately given back to the US.
5 Likes
I’m sorry Aussies I know it’s your tank and you deserve fair representation , but have you seen the average Abrams player in the US tree? why would you want to bring that curse to the British tree 😔
But if it comes it comes
Good Morn’ lol
1 Like
You can check my Abrams battle stats. The US was the first tech tree I completed, so the KD/KR of most vehicles is quite low, but I think my SEP and SEPv2 are pretty good.No matter what Abrams players are like, the Abrams itself is a solid tank.
1 Like
My guy, are you saying no country should have US-produced Lend-Lease equipment?
Service nation is much more important to presence in the TT than the original manufacturer.
6 Likes
Just to clarify, it came to the British tree first in 2022: [Development] Skink: The Bird-eating Lizard - News - War Thunder
Later the US tree in 2024 alongside the T77E1 to help pad out US SPAA.
6 Likes
Is there anything on my end would you be kind enough to highlight or am I green atm m8 ?
Great, and here’s the Leopard 2AV with the 105mm gun the US had built to trial against the XM1.
It’s in the German tree, not the US tree.
Britain doesn’t need the M1A2.
2 Likes
You mean the tank that Germany lied with, sent under false pretenses and got upset when they were called out on their antics? The US also never had the PT19 Leopard built for them and never paid for it, it was built for Germany in Germany and they wanted to see if other nations wanted the upcoming Leopard 2.
5 Likes
Who cares about those issues? Germany wasn’t fielding a Leopard 2 with a 105. That was mounted at the request of the US.
There is no difference between the US testing the Leopard 2 and the UK testing the M1A2. The M1A2 should not go to the UK. The UK doesn’t need the M1A2.
1 Like