i dont have the abrams either so…
Fair but you aren’t arguing it just because you can. You even brought up the point that the M833 round isn’t that much more powerful than what it currently has.
so why do you want it added ?
M774 is still good enough, you can pen everything frontally
am not against it being added although
its more correct to move m774 to the first APFSDS slot and m833 to the second because that’s what it used. M729 was replaced by 774 when Abrams entered service then 833 in 1983 before IPm1 came out
3 Likes
Which is why I said it might move it to 11.0.
How about no, decompression is great, and th Br changes did some good.
not over 23mms and not changing where it stands in terms of other MBTs at the BR because it would still have less pen than the others also why i dont want it to get m900
1 Like
decompression was good needed to be more infact
1 Like
might aswell move Maus to 8.0 becayse decompression
what is the maus compressing? the BR ceiling went up all the 10.3s went up and so did everything above it
1 Like
I sure loving facing Maus in a pershing
u get to face conqueror with 501mm pen at a full up-teir too a whole br above you is allowed to be tricky to face frontally
so then decompress it
your not exactly wrong maybe it will when the br goes up to 13 for ground
Except that the Leopard 2AV, it’s almost direct parallel, is at 10.0 and gets DM33… Curious…
3 Likes
I think this is the newest troll I have seen here. Funny thing is, there unfortunately actually exist such people that defend him.
I said probably. Ultimately, it is gaijin’s balancing algorithm that will decide if it goes up or not. If the performance is increased, it would most likely go up, if it isn’t, it’ll stay where it is.
No need to be rude.
1 Like
facts
1 Like
I say the DM83 😂
Name one Eastern Bloc tank it can pen from the front if hulled down and how difficult that becomes at 1) range or 2) snap shots while every other tank (both NATO and Eastern Bloc) can literally go through you frontally by point and clicking