I finally got my hands on « La Protection Balistique des Chars Modernes », Trucks & Tanks Magazine, mars-avril 2018, I’ll send the relevant information tomorrow
6 Likes
Thanks.
Gonna open the report in a bit
3 Likes
So, they’ve just dropped the devblog for the AZUR. They are going with ERA despite the blocks being NERA, and they don’t mention LWR. So I guess none of the bug reports that were made are actually being taken into account…
I am very unsure about the Leclerc ever being « unnerfed » despite all the documents you guys are giving them
7 Likes
And no OFL F2 either:
gaijin is taking the piss. Such a terrible addition.
9 Likes
They must be joking it’s not possible… how can they say that as if it was incredible at 11.7
That’s litteraly one of the worst base penetration in the game…
Second worst, the L27A1 used by the Challenger 2 has 11mm less pen. But yeah, it’s still bad, especially considering all the other weaknesses.
It affects a fairly minor nation so I highly doubt there will be any amount of outcry about it.
But it does highlight the fact that gaijin’s plea to not review bomb the game and instead take the criticism to the forums was all about puting the dissent in a place where they could ignore it without consequences. This thread is one of the most viewed of the forum, with more than 800 replies and over 1200 individual likes and yet absolutely nothing has changed or is changing.
They either don’t care, or our feedback isn’t being communicated to the devs by the people who should be doing it. Either way, it’s like screaming into the void.
6 Likes
“Leclerc AZUR still retains its powerful main advantages — good protection at the front and sides of the turret”
What since when xd
7 Likes
Nah trust me they see everything that goes around, they just dont care.
They always treated France as a minor nation while in reality its one of the biggest country when it comes military Technologies and equipments.
Also its not just about us, for example look at PSO and KF41 situation, same goes for Britian as well.
İf community stands together bombing or any kind of act will be more then enough to do something.
Thats a very good joke coming from a clown tbh Xd.
1 Like
Also the mobility is sluggish at low speed as well
1 Like
Almost everything is either missing or wrong when it comes to Leclerc.
The only thing that is correct is Turret Rotation Speed looks like…
1 Like
Honestly, I’m pretty sure that the Devs never go on the forums, possibly on the Russian forum, you understand, a developer can’t mix with the slot machines that we are… I think that nothing is communicated to them, ahhh, we’ve had the right to a few messages in blue but only to explain how the bug reports work or how their advisor system works.
But I don’t remember seeing anything like “I understand your frustration, so I’m going to actively ask for explanations” and in the event of feedback, answers? No…
What would it cost the developers to make some kind of “Bultin” or whatever it’s called, but in any case, explanations from the developers on the Leclerc’s situation, such as why they categorically refuse to add the OFL F2, their sources for the Leclerc’s armor (because if they refuse ours, why not, but at least have the courage to show us theirs - what are they afraid of? Of showing that they don’t have any more proof than we do?)
There’s also the question of the French CF, which hasn’t been implemented with the deep-sea fleet. Any explanations or solutions? No, nothing…
In short, the players are on their own.
6 Likes
THIS. This is exactly why I made a thread to get them to look over the work their staff (especially the consultants) do. No communication other than some Gaijin mod giving us a generic excuse on how they work.
@Unl3ashed20
That’s the official verbiage used.
Report moderators cannot dictate what will be done, and developers may not have an answer for them right away cause they might be busy working on another issue at the time of it being passed to them.
@Panther2995
Toxic behavior such as that does not make changes happen.
Leopard 2A5 PSO’s armor has been passed to devs.
KF-41 is accurate to our knowledge with any bugs passed to devs.
British armor is getting massive fixes this major update…
Yeah but I have something you don’t:
All the reports have been forwarded, nothing about telling us that they’d need more sources or whatever. Just closed and forwarded to devs. Nothing afterwards. Probably went directly into the trash bin
1 Like
Reports at “worst” stay in their file systems.
I doubt any get trashed cause there are valuable data to reference back when necessary, especially when considering future conflicting reports.
Such as F-4EJ CCIP vs no CCIP.
Not when it’s been taken as “disproven” by their so called sources. They probably only do that in case they got some sources twice and don’t need to reverify them
1 Like
… Why am I not surprised.
Seriously, it doesn’t matter how hard we try and what information we give them, it’s never enough.
2 Likes
Didnt asked your opinion so keep it to yourself.
İ made a peace with you but sometimes you need to know where to stop and not interfere Razer.