Why do you keep using these fictitious numbers?Have you ever seen 4 seconds in any source? Not a single good source even claims 5.
That video doesn’t show a full charging cycle. Even the fragment shown is only 5 seconds long, and it doesn’t show the gun being brought into position or the conveyor fully rotating.
The video doesn’t even show the moment of the shot, although the recoil of the gun and the extraction of the shell tray takes 0.2-0.3 seconds.
From this, you’ll get ~6
Literally here you see 7-8 seconds
Here you see 5 seconds for an INCOMPLETE cycle.
There is no:
firing
recoil of the breech
extraction of the shell tray
bringing the gun to the loading angle
returning the gun to the firing angle
unlatching the gun
Taking into account the remaining parts, you get 6+
You literally made up your numbers, denying primary sources that say exactly 6, denying a number of authoritative secondary sources that say 6, denying videos that never show the full cycle from shot to shot in 4 or 5 seconds.
Im very confused about the front hull armor of the Leclerc, where did Gaijin even get the dimensions and protection estimates of the composite from? All the info i could find of the Swedish mbt trials only showed the turret, and the discrepancy between the MSC and production Leclerc are bizarre, especially on the sloped front plate that on the Leclerc cant even stop 3bm22 while the MSC can stop 3bm42 in some places
Many people here deny the manufacturer’s documentation, make incorrect cycle measurements that only cover part of it, and for some reason turn a blind eye to the fact that at least 7 seconds pass between shots.
Oh yeah, and they’re also inventing some “emergency” reloading modes. Show me that button on the remote, or even one mention of it.
Ignoring countless sources that indicates or shows that Leclerc can reload under 6 seconds while showing me some questionable sources that can’t be find through online search doesn’t suit you at all.
Of all the people I thought you were better than this.
Same manufacturerer also claims it can reload significantly faster.
So what is it going to be Gunjob?
Should we take this “as marketing lie” like Gaijin claimed on EFT’s flight performance bug report?
In this case I’ll choose to believe the actual report that has led us to 5 second reload time, hell even Gaijin knew Leclerc can reload in 5 seconds and even faster all those years yet they kept it back due to balance reasons.
How about you go find that bug report that has led us to 5 second reload and look for the details.
Honestly I don’t understand what you and that funny guy who’s calling himself Ralin trying to accomplish in here but let me tell you, I’m not interested at all.
Also documents from UK MOD about Leclerc( which is questionable whether source itself was displaying full capabilities of Leclerc or not) is not something I’ll take seriously.
I did its all just defence magazines, encyclopaedia’s and authored books, nothing direct from GIAT certainly not a primary source in there at all. All of the primary sourcing claims 6 second reload.
If gaijins devs do decide to act upon the recent report and give leclerc a 6 second reload, I fully believe the likes of abrams could lose their 5 second reload as that is completely unbalanced.
How about we buff Type-10’s reload up to 2.5 seconds and Leclerc’s reload to 4 seconds with emergency mode while giving. 3.2-3.4 second reload to Leopards,Abram’s while keeping Challengers at 5 second despite multiple secondary sources states loader can push much faster than 5 seconds in real life.
Im good with every buff for every tank what I can’t stand is that some people can’t accept the fact that other nations can also produce good capabilities.