I would like to see a right camo pattern on Leclerc BUT
Firstly, gaijing not interested in this, they won’t care.
And it gonna be for GE anyway and i dont see any point to spend my GE for simple camo…
I’m using wt live skins for my AZUR and XXI, as for the S2 I bought AUSTERLITZ from market.
It’s the most accurate camo for Leclerc I Believe.
Yeap, the wt live camos is pretty good option. But unfortunetly im on ps and i cant use wt live skins :(
This one is an XLT variant also called tropicalized with an AZUR kit, that’s the UAE custom variant, wich have many little things different from the whole french variants. you can find all the differences by reading in detail here or by doing simple searches on the web if you want ;)
It gets even funnier since somehow, through ways no one can truly grasp, the probability of fuel tank explosions (or the chances of your crew surviving it would be more accurate i guess) is apparently linked to the crew survivability skill. Why? I don’t know so don’t ask me. Just expert your crews i guess and almost never lose crew from fuel explosions ;-)
imo, either the fuel can explode inside the tank, and if it does (not happening irl but anyways, in game) then its a mission kill and theres no way no matter how much stalinium your commander, gunner and driver put into their helmets they wouldnt continue operating the tank, or it simply doesnt explode.
Nah you are teaching the fuel to remain calm and not explode when being hit.
pls add fuel whispering skill subdivision diesel whisperer. most pointless job ever.
You just don’t understand, Gaijin uses top-secret Ahnenerbe development — fuel in super position. It’s diesel, gasoline, and kerosene all at once
More like liquid TNT
Considering Leclercs are already neck and neck with 2A6 they might actually become one of those tanks that deserve a higher BR, such as uparmored Leopards.
I personally compare them to 2A5 rather than 2A6. Unless you are speaking of the NL leopard stats, in which case I advise you to have a look at the MSC and the different Leopard 2A4. French players did better with the 2A4NL than with the MSC as the same BR, and its the latter that went up in BR, because the German leopard comply ruins the overall 2A4 stats
it should go up only if it receives SHARD
Or if all current top MBTs go up
currently it’s

Good :
- Gun handling
- Reload
- Mobility
Not good :
- Penetration
- Overall surivability
2A6 is superior tank in almost every way.
Worse reload.
Worse mobility
Arguably as bad armour bar turret front.
DM53 out the L/55 is substantially better though.
Similiar mobility
Much better turret and hull armor
Spall Liners
Much better penetration
Commander thermals
Much better gun mantlet
What were you saying again?
Hull armour is the same as the 2a4 which is arguably worse than the Leclercs.
Already said this.
Stated this with DM53
Lower generation gunner thermals though
Much better how? 😂 the mantlet for both are massive weak points, in fact arguably worse on leopard as it’s so tall, allowing for it to be shot before even cresting a hill to fire.
2A6 has better hull armor than 2A4, learn the difference. Leclerc’s UFP can Be penetrated by HSTVL, try the same thing with 2A6
Lacking commander thermals is huge drawback.
Leclerc’s mantlet can be penetrated by M18’s APHE round.
You’re are clueless person who makes empty claims.
So can a 2A6 mate ?
Hardly. The abrams without it does extemely well.
The Leopards only having Gen 1 thermals on gunner sights at top tier is a bigger drawback.
As can a 2a6? You’re acting like in game the mantlets aren’t all complete weakspots for every tank for balance.
Hardly, you’re just an angry little man who cannot handle when someone disagrees.
See i can say stupid stuff too.
Or remain civil and discuss stuff.
2A6 UFP is immune to HSTVL round, how clueless you are?
Try to penetrate 2A6 mantlet with M18, I dare you.
No I just can’t stand people who has no idea what they are talking about while acts like they know everything.
Learn how armor parameters works and differences between tanks then come back later.
Imagine claiming having only better gunner thermal sight is better than having both gunner and commander thermal.
Lol,lmao even.
Anyway it seems I’m wasting my time with someone who has no idea what his talking about, no need to derail this thread anymore.