Yes, I just saw the MSC’s UFP armor, and it far surpasses that of the Leclerc (it seems its UFP armor is one of the strongest currently available).
Hoping it corrects those of the current Leclercs.
2 Likes
Gaijin reaction:
5 Likes
this thing is 100 percent going to be 11.0 xD
Hope it happens! And CR2 can fall further and further behind and end up at 10.3-10.7 where it belongs.
inb4 muh Swedish trials
2 Likes
Somehow prototipe leclerc that is using Same hull with weaker turret has better protection :)
3 Likes
Yeah everyone brings them up when they were outdated by the time most the tanks they refer to went into service xD
I am waiting for your reply in Mig-23m vs Mig-21.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
4 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT
I’ve experienced this frustration mainly when reporting about French vehicles so I’ll post it here,
For the love of all that is good in this world, moderators who put “Not enough info” on bug reports that are SPOON FED TO THEM WITH PROOF SO OBVIOUS THAT AN INFANT COULD UNDERSTAND shouldn’t be handling reports, and they should be fired.
Not enough info.
Not enough info.
What makes this worse is the fact that y’all are blatantly disrespectful to those of us who take the time out of our own days to manually source and make reports.
One of y’all (I 100% know which moderator you are, but mentioning your name directly will probably get me banned here so I’ll just say you are a complete disgrace who will get what is coming to you) loves to leave snarky/disrespectful answers that openly insult the intelligence of the person who submitted the bug report. This is 100% a result of moderators now being anonymous to the submitter, and being emboldened to act heinously because they can’t be directly identified.
My point is none of us are getting paid to take our own time to fix the game for developers who are incompetent and can’t do their own research.
The least y’all could do is not be moderators who make submitting these reports even more of a pain with magical rainbow levels of stupid guidelines or logic, or just plain out being malicious and denying a report and insulting the person who submitted it seemingly for fun.
I give up on any attempts to improve this game; my report about the AMX-40 has been accepted for almost a whole year now while the tank in question has been moved up in BR.
I’ll still play, but this game simply isn’t worth it putting in your spare time to improve.
14 Likes
Very cool new video of the Leclerc XLR !
3 Likes
I have done a report about this with more sources and link to your OP, hopefully it will be accepted now
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/AwiHGdG0ckJn
This has to be a joke right? For my faith in humanity I will just assume you forgot the /s after this sentence.
CR2 is 10.7 tops remove L27 on the base model and it offers no more protection or fire power than the CR1 MK3 which is 10.7
It is the worst top tier tank
Its efficiency will never change as only a handful play it. To think its forced to face 2A7s and T-80BVMs is what’s really stupid.
11.3 or even 11.0 I can agree. 10.7 and below is pure copium tho
11.3 is 12.0 every game, with some deocmpression sure.
CR2 is no better than a Leopard 2 or Vickers Mk 7.
Remov
And 9.7 is basically 10.7. The challenger, however bad it is, is already better than everything at 10.7, let alone all the 9.7 vehicles that get constant 10.7 up tiers. You are just wishing to move compression down with this kind of ideas
Leopard 2A4 is superior to CR2. Thats 10.3
Remove L27 and what does a CR2 have thats better than a 2A4?
Mobility?
Armour is about the same (Turret cheeks are better on CR2) but the rest is a OHK
Fire power = to Leopard 2A4 with L27 removed
Crew layout?
Rate of fire?
Optics
So out of the categories CR2 has superior turret armour and superior Optics.
You’ve had responses, I am taking time away from teh forums mate.
do not use cobra button.
Learn the missiles they are easy enough to deal with, I linked you two extensive guides on radars, ARH, SARHs and DEFYN has one on IRCCM . As well as all this I gave you several well worded, graded and explained messages on pretty much anything you will encounter for that BR.
Do not follow me around the forum chasing me up Ill just block you.
2 i am massively decreasing my time on said forum due to personal life.
good luck out htere.
10.7*
Leopard 2a4, a5 and a6 all have worse hull armour than the CR2.
RoF goes to the cr2 as well, CR2 optics are better.
Crew layout is arguably as bad as each other.
the 2a4 with DM33 could be 11.0 , same as CR2 would be without L27 but still L26 xD